CIO Canada — In recent times, many high-profile court cases have hinged on electronic records held by a company or individual.
Electronic discovery, or e-discovery as it is becoming more commonly known, is one of the hottest legal issues facing companies today. In simple terms, e-discovery is a firm's obligation to produce all documents or information in its possession, including documents that exist only in electronic form, in the event of initiated or threatened litigation. With that obligation comes costs and risk: the costs of potentially reviewing millions of pages of electronic information, and the risk of failing to understand the information that the company itself is creating.
As the head gatekeeper of corporate information, the CIO faces many issues around E-discovery. For example, what information retention strategy should the CIO put in place in view of the fact that the company may one day face a significant lawsuit? And what should the role of the CIO be when the organization is threatened with a lawsuit?
Here are five key issues around e-discovery that the CIO needs to be aware of:
1. Litigation is an active and strategic focus of the business.
It is important to recognize that in today's business climate, litigation is not always a last-resort alternative. Increasingly, it is becoming an active strategy of the business and is being critically assessed, based on its potential to generate a positive return on investment.
Other strategic factors, such as the potential impact on the organization's reputation and the ability to create competitive advantage, form part of the equation in evaluating litigation as an ongoing strategic focus.
2. In-house counsel should play an important role in information access and management.
In many organizations, the in-house counsel group is treated as a separate silo—a necessary adjunct that is strictly a cost of doing business—and its role is to react to problems once they arise. But in-house counsel can also be an excellent resource for the CIO, assisting in the building of IT strategies around access to information, document retention, document destruction, information collaboration and litigation.
We have been involved in too many situations where in-house counsel doesn't have a fundamental understanding of the information that a company possesses—the nature of the information, where it is located, how it is being created, and how and why it is being utilized by the business.
E-discovery includes an obligation to preserve all relevant electronic evidence as soon as litigation is threatened or contemplated. That obligation simply cannot be fulfilled in the absence of complete information about the company's information structure and technology. And whose obligation does it become, the CIO's or in-house counsel's? This is an issue that the company needs to address.
