Offering regional and national programs, CIO (and CSO) events bring together some of the most respected names and thought leaders in information technology and security. Presented by CIOs and other senior level executives, these invitation-only programs offer timely topics and strong networking. Learn More »

CIO Executive Council

A Peer-Advisory Service and Professional Association for CIOs

Turn Geeks into Leaders

June 17, 11:30 AM - 12:30 PM U.S./ET (GMT-4)

Larry Bonfante, CIO of the U.S. Tennis Association, will discuss the skills and approaches that your rising IT leaders must learn to be effective in an executive capacity.

How to Handle Your New CEO: Managing Turnover at the Top

June 18, 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM U.S./Eastern (GMT-4)

Turbulent times have increased turnover at the top. Find out what Council CIOs have done to "break in" new CEOs—build relationships, set expectations, educate on the role of IT.

Mid-Market CIO Panel: Tips and Techniques for Improving Vendor Relationships

July 15, 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM U.S./Eastern (GMT-4)

We'll highlight relationship priorities and best practices identified in a Council study, and we'll interact with a CIO panel on the approaches they've used to improve strategic vendor partnerships.

Executive Competencies Assessment Tool

Assess Your Business Leadership Skills with the Council's new benchmarking tool. Rate yourself in change leadership, strategy, customer focus and more.

More / Register »

Learn more about the CIO Executive Council »

RESOURCE CENTER

buy a link »

SUBSCRIBE TO CIO

Are you involved in setting the direction for your company's IT budget or strategy?

Apply today for a FREE subscription to CIO Magazine!

Subscription Services »

Reprints »

News Short

Oracle, SAP Agree to Time Extension in Trade Secrets Suit

Both sides in Oracle's contentious trade-secrets lawsuit against SAP would appreciate a little more breathing room.

Leave a comment

By China Martens

May 16, 2007 — IDG News Service (Boston Bureau) —

It appears both sides in Oracle's contentious trade-secrets lawsuit against SAP would appreciate a little more breathing room.

Although there's little love lost between the bitter applications rivals, they have agreed to a legal stipulation extending the time for Oracle to file an amended complaint and for SAP to respond to that filing. The lawyers representing the companies signed the agreement on Tuesday.

Oracle fired the opening salvo against SAP on March 22, filing a surprise lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. In the suit Oracle charged SAP, its SAP America division, its TomorrowNow subsidiary and 50 unnamed individuals Oracle claimed were SAP employees with violating U.S. fraud legislation and engaging in unfair competition and civil conspiracy.

Oracle's complaint alleged that one or more staff at TomorrowNow, SAP's third-party maintenance subsidiary, pretended to be Oracle customers and illegally hacked into Oracle's secure support Web site for users of PeopleSoft and JD Edwards applications. The employees then allegedly downloaded vast amounts of confidential Oracle software and support material.

Oracle further charged that SAP copied the Oracle content and used it to offer Oracle customers cut-rate support services with the ultimate aim of persuading them to dump Oracle applications in favor of SAP's alternative software.

So far, both sides appear at loggerheads, with Oracle not backing down and SAP saying it will defend itself aggressively. While Oracle executives have not commented publicly on the lawsuit, SAP CEO Henning Kagermann spoke out in April. "We have no intention to settle; why should we?" he said during SAP's first-quarter earnings call. "We don't think anything is wrong with our company."

Oracle had been set to file an amended complaint to its lawsuit between April 21 and May 18, but instead that date has now been put back to no later than June 1, according to Tuesday's court stipulation. Likewise, SAP was on track to respond to Oracle's amended complaint within 20 days of its appearance, the vendor now has until July 2 to file a response.

The case was originally assigned to U.S. District Court Judge Maxine M. Chesney in San Francisco, but she recused herself last week for reasons that were not disclosed. U.S. District Court Judge Martin J. Jenkins, also in San Francisco, is now presiding over the case.