Offering regional and national programs, CIO (and CSO) events bring together some of the most respected names and thought leaders in information technology and security. Presented by CIOs and other senior level executives, these invitation-only programs offer timely topics and strong networking. Learn More »
Webcast: In the Google Apps Cloud: How to Achieve Your Business Objectives
Dec 3rd, '09, 1 - 2 pm US/Eastern (GMT-5)
Join Council member Brent Hoag, Director, Global IT, at JohnsonDiversey, as he discusses the adoption of Google Apps which has helped meet four corporate goals; sustainability, simplification, increased employee productivity and global collaboration.
Webcast: Collaboration Initiatives: Benchmarks & Best Practices
Dec 15th, '09, 4 - 5 pm US/Eastern (GMT-5)
Join Council members Ruth Thorpe, VP & CIO at the U.S. Pharmaceutical Operations of Sanofi-Aventis, and Gary Kuyper, CIO at Bethany Christian Services, as they speak about their collaboration initiatives and experiences in how and why they chose the social networking and collaboration tools they are using and their business goals for collaboration, and facing culture change challenges.
Data Overview: Collaboration Initiatives Field Guide: Benchmarks & Best Practices
This appendix to the Council Field Guide provides an analysis which discusses benchmarks for collaboration IT implementation costs, adoption rates and payoffs. The overview identifies top IT and business goals and satisfaction rates for collaboration initiatives as well as best practices and lessons learned for implementing collaboration IT.
Learn more about the CIO Executive Council »October 26, 2007 — CIO —
By most accounts, upgrades to Apple's Leopard OS are going smoothly. Some users are reporting disappointment, however, that Flash isn't working correctly; and the much anticipated Java 1.6 is missing. While these two issues won't adversely affect most users, for those who depend on Java and Flash, it's more than just a nuisance. Fortunately, it may be a short-lived one.
Attendees at Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference earlier this year were excited by confirmation that Java would be bundled with Leopard. There were, however, inherent questions about which version of Java would actually be included. By design, Java 6.0 doesn't easily support Mac OS X Tiger or earlier versions of Apple's operating systems. Unfortunately, many users felt that Java 1.5 lacks the juice today's developers need.
Java 1.6 is already available for Linux and Windows users, so when a developer preview Java for Mac OS X appeared and, better yet, worked on Leopard, developers were overjoyed. Disappointment was nearly instantaneous when it was discovered that Apple had chosen to bundle Java 1.5 with Leopard instead.
The move was likely designed to include backward compatibility among OS X versions and ensure that Java was available on both Intel and PPC-based Macs. That's not doing much to assuage enterprise users hoping to benefit from increased system performance and developers who were looking forward to additional functionality.
"The number one things users see by upgrading [to Java 6] is that applications run much faster," says a spokesperson for Sun Microsystems, the creators of Java. "Everything's just speedier."
So when will Apple users see Java 1.6? Sun "We can't comment on the timeline because that's not an operating system that we have a relationship with," she says.
Apple representatives could not be reached for comment.
Among the disappointed is Wilhelm Fitzpatrick, enterprise Java developer and consultant, who says he is "frustrated that Apple has decided to make Mac OS X increasingly irrelevant as an enterprise development platform."
Fitzpatrick notes that the Java developer community has been itching for the 1.6 upgrade for quite a while. "Java 6 has been out in general availability for nearly a year at this point, and Apple did tease developers with a Java 6 preview early last year that made it look like they were not going to suffer from there usual abysmal lag time in delivering new versions of Java. Sadly at that point they went dead silent on the issue."