Offering regional and national programs, CIO (and CSO) events bring together some of the most respected names and thought leaders in information technology and security. Presented by CIOs and other senior level executives, these invitation-only programs offer timely topics and strong networking. Learn More »
Mid-Market CIO Panel: Tips and Techniques for Improving Vendor Relationships
July 15, 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM U.S./Eastern (GMT-4)
We'll highlight relationship priorities and best practices identified in a Council study, and we'll interact with a CIO panel on the approaches they've used to improve strategic vendor partnerships.
Secrets of Successful Vendor Contract Negotiations for the Mid-Market
Sept. 10, 2009, 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM U.S./Eastern (GMT-4)
On this free public Council teleconference, Matthew A. Karlyn, attorney at Foley & Lardner in Boston, will share tips on negotiating tactics and new, creative contract terms to help mid-market CIOs make better deals.
Executive Competencies Assessment Tool
Assess Your Business Leadership Skills with the Council's new benchmarking tool. Rate yourself in change leadership, strategy, customer focus and more.
Learn more about the CIO Executive Council »Apply today for a FREE subscription to CIO Magazine!
April 07, 2006 — CIO —
About 200 "citizen lobbyists" who descended on Washington, D.C., this week called for the U.S. Congress to require that electronic voting machines include paper-trail records.
The activists called on Congress to move ahead on a bill called the Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act, introduced in February 2005, but stalled in the House of Representatives committee. The bill would require all e-voting machines used in federal elections to include a voter-verified paper trail, and it would require the U.S. Election Assistance Commission to conduct random hand counts of e-voting machine records.
As many U.S. states move toward electronic voting systems since problems in Florida with paper ballots in the 2000 presidential election, critics of e-voting have questioned the accuracy of the newer technology. Without a paper trail, e-voting machines could be manipulated, and there would be little chance of catching the fraud, e-voting critics say.
Members of the I Count Coalition who came to Washington, D.C., this week repeated concerns that many e-voting machines do not produce a printout of each vote that can be used to double-check the machine’s results. In two days on Capitol Hill, they planned to meet with about 100 lawmakers and deliver a petition with more than 50,000 signatures calling on the House Administration Committee to act on the verified-voting bill.
The bill, sponsored by Rep. Rush Holt, a New Jersey Democrat, has 169 cosponsors, more than a third of the members of the House.
Supporters of e-voting machines say the devices have several safety mechanisms in place to protect against voter fraud. E-voting machines are typically stand-alone machines not connected to the Internet, and access to them is limited, supporters say.
Despite some reports of e-voting problems during the 2004 general election, the Information Technology Association of America (ITAA) called e-voting in 2004 and in off-year elections in 2005 a "major success." ITAA represents a group of e-voting vendors.
During a press conference Friday, members of the coalition urged Congress to move ahead with the bill.
Backers of paperless e-voting machines are "choosing technology over verifiability and accountability," said A.J. Devies, a board member of the Florida Fair Elections Coalition and Center. "It’s time to pull the curtain away from the little man who says, ‘Pay no attention to the man behind the screen.’ "
Devies, who uses a wheelchair scooter to walk long distances because of past back and nerve injuries, has opposed the National Federation of the Blind in its effort to speed adoption of e-voting machines. The machines make it possible for blind people to vote without assistance, the group says.