The Inside Story of Why Puma Dumped Four Cloud Vendors for One

FREE

Become An Insider

Sign up now and get free access to hundreds of Insider articles, guides, reviews, interviews, blogs, and other premium content from the best tech brands on the Internet: CIO, CITEworld, CSO, Computerworld, InfoWorld, ITworld and Network World. Learn more.

Puma simplified its cloud strategy and saved money by consolidating from using four cloud vendors down to just one. Here’s what they did and why they did it.

Cloud’s ability to ratchet server power and storage up and down as needed suits the demands of online marketing campaigns that tend to gear up and wind down quickly. So a few years ago, sneaker manufacturer Puma ran fast toward adoption.

But soon the $3.6 billion sportswear company found itself dealing with four different cloud providers, each with its own contract terms, pricing and technology options. Puma decided to try to get control of that “large, wild infrastructure” by consolidating clouds, says Jay Basnight, the company’s head of digital strategy.

That cloud consolidation projects are starting to emerge shows how entrenched cloud computing has become in the IT landscape, says Chris Harding, director of interoperability at The Open Group, a global consortium that leads the development of open, vendor-neutral IT standards and certifications. The problem is that switching clouds isn’t as simple as the cloud hype suggests, he says. Applications built for one vendor’s cloud may not run well on another’s. CIOs have to pay attention to different programming interfaces and architectures.

To continue reading, please begin the free registration process or sign in to your Insider account by entering your email address:
Join the discussion
Be the first to comment on this article. Our Commenting Policies