Offering regional and national programs, CIO (and CSO) events bring together some of the most respected names and thought leaders in information technology and security. Presented by CIOs and other senior level executives, these invitation-only programs offer timely topics and strong networking. Learn More »
Public Council Teleconference: Application Rationalization — Hidden Costs and Smart Decisions
November 17 at 11:00 am US/Eastern (GMT-5)
Join Honorio Padrón, of The Hackett Group, who will share the drivers for companies to tackle application rationalization and the results of research that define the hidden cost of complexity. Additionally, we will discuss key decision milestones—to start or not, holding the course steady and fulfilling expectations.
Virtual Desktop Cost-Benefit Analysis — Michael Jacobs, Catlin Group
The analysis contained in this presentation measures the cost of everything from the machines and licenses to the infrastructure for virtual vs. traditional desktop environments.
Honor your best senior team members - Apply for the CIO Ones to Watch Award
Get well-earned public recognition for your top up-and-coming team members, your IT organization and your enterprise. Award winners will be announced, publicized and feted in May 2010, great timing to help attract new IT recruits to your company.
Learn more about the CIO Executive Council »January 17, 2007 — CIO —
Still reeling from the effects of a corporate reorganization that included heavy layoffs, Intel reported a profit of US$1.5 billion for the fourth quarter, down 39 percent compared to that period last year.
The company posted quarterly earnings of $0.26 per share on revenue of $9.7 billion. That revenue was down 5 percent from the same quarter last year, but came in just above Wall Street estimates of $0.25 per-share earnings and $9.44 billion revenue, according to analysts polled by Thomson First Call. However, Intel said its earnings were inflated by about $0.01 per share because of one-time actions in its reorganization, such as the sale of its communications and application processor unit to Marvell Technology Group and the layoffs of 10,500 workers.
Intel had lost significant market share to rival Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) over the year, but many observers felt the company had rebounded in recent months with the launch of many new chips, including the Core 2 Duo and quad-core Xeon chips.
Intel said its sales of microprocessor units reached a record high, led by flash memory units. But that success was offset by soft sales of chipset and motherboard units, Intel said in a release. Overall, the company said it had a poor performance because it was unable to reduce its fixed costs or forecast product demand, while its competitors launched new products and exerted price pressure.
As expected, the company’s profit also slumped when comparing the 2006 fiscal year to 2005. Intel reported an annual profit of $5 billion, which was 42 percent below its number last year.
For fiscal 2006, Intel posted revenue of $35.4 billion—9 percent less than fiscal 2005—and earnings of $0.86 per share—39 percent less than 2005. The figures were slightly higher than analysts’ expectations of $35.13 billion annual revenue and $0.84 earnings per share, according to Thomson.
The annual numbers fell short of Intel Chief Executive Paul Otellini’s own estimate, however. When he announced his plan to restructure the company in April, Otellini predicted the company’s operating income would tumble from $12.1 billion in 2005 to $9.3 billion in 2006. In fact, it reached only $5.7 billion.
Intel survived "a challenging year" in 2006, Otellini said during a conference call with investors on Tuesday. Even one of its bright spots—strong sales of its new Core 2 Duo processor—was offset by a greater market trend from desktop PCs to notebooks.
The company will produce better results in 2007, he promised. The reorganization plan has already cut Intel’s employee headcount from 102,500 in the middle of 2006 to 94,100 at the end of the year. Once the company is no longer paying the cost of those extra workers, it will reap greater profits from new technology launches, Otellini said.