Offering regional and national programs, CIO (and CSO) events bring together some of the most respected names and thought leaders in information technology and security. Presented by CIOs and other senior level executives, these invitation-only programs offer timely topics and strong networking. Learn More »
Public Council Teleconference: Application Rationalization — Hidden Costs and Smart Decisions
November 17 at 11:00 am US/Eastern (GMT-5)
Join Honorio Padrón, of The Hackett Group, who will share the drivers for companies to tackle application rationalization and the results of research that define the hidden cost of complexity. Additionally, we will discuss key decision milestones—to start or not, holding the course steady and fulfilling expectations.
Virtual Desktop Cost-Benefit Analysis — Michael Jacobs, Catlin Group
The analysis contained in this presentation measures the cost of everything from the machines and licenses to the infrastructure for virtual vs. traditional desktop environments.
Honor your best senior team members - Apply for the CIO Ones to Watch Award
Get well-earned public recognition for your top up-and-coming team members, your IT organization and your enterprise. Award winners will be announced, publicized and feted in May 2010, great timing to help attract new IT recruits to your company.
Learn more about the CIO Executive Council »October 01, 2003 — CIO —
Mergers and their consequences have again been very much on CIOs’ minds with PeopleSoft’s recent acquisition of J.D. Edwards and Oracle’s threatened takeover of PeopleSoft. The familiar refrain—what will become of the end users?
It’s a scenario with ample precedent. Back in the days when John Kennedy lived in the White House, eight vendors dominated the U.S. mainframe market. IBM’s share reached as high as
60 percent. The rest was divided among the so-called Seven Dwarfs: Burroughs, Control Data, GE, Honeywell, NCR, RCA and Univac. A few years later, Honeywell acquired GE’s computer division and Univac swallowed RCA’s leaving a gaggle of IBM-wannabees known by the acronym BUNCH. As consolidations winnowed the bunch, each stage left another customer group bereft of its chosen computer architecture and struggling to adapt.
The lessons from data centers past are both encouraging and disconcerting. Veterans of the mainframe market shakeout say the vendors did try to support their customers’ migrations to new systems. On the other hand, they and observers warn that 2003 is not 1963, or even 1983. Today’s technology markets are more competitive, and vendor-user relations are not as genteel.
The bottom line: CIOs should expect some important bumps as mature enterprise software markets such as ERP move toward consolidation. The mainframe veterans certainly saw their share.
"There were lots of sleepless nights," recalls Paul Strassmann, a former CIO at Xerox, which itself briefly entered the mainframe business. Strassmann, who also served as CIO at the Defense Department, says he was hired by Xerox in about 1970 "to get rid of our IBM mainframes and install our own Xerox mainframes." He did. Xerox ran more than 100 of the systems, he says, but then in 1974, Xerox sold its mainframe business to Honeywell.
Honeywell worked hard for several years trying to make the marriage work, but eventually there weren’t enough spare circuit boards for the Xerox machines, and field service engineers had to develop workarounds, Strassmann says. "Our maintenance costs went up and up," he adds. So, Xerox migrated to Honeywell iron.
Then, in the 1980s, Strassmann’s data centers took another blow when Honeywell sold what was left of its mainframe operations to a "maintenance only" unit of Wang Laboratories. The Wang engineers could fix things, says Strassmann, but if you wanted major parts or additional equipment, you had to search the used market. "It was as if they cut off both arms at the elbow," he says.
Despite Strassmann’s experiences, though, John Phelps, a vice president at Gartner and himself a 30-year IBM veteran, says most of the mainframe transitions of years past were heavily supported by the surviving vendor. "Usually the vendors developed extensive conversion programs," he says, referring to both software programs and support teams. "It wasn’t a large universe of customers, so vendors didn’t want to alienate them," he adds.