Google recently released Chromecast Audio, a variant of its Chromecast for audio. The device turns your ‘dumb’ speakers into ‘smart’ speakers by taking them online.
Do you need one?
I love music and if I could, I would install speakers everywhere -- office, living room, bedroom, kitchen, and back patio. The bigger challenge is bringing music to these speakers. Sometimes you want to install them in way that keeps them out of sight. But hiding speakers creates the connectivity problem: How are you going to plug your iPhone or Android devices to those speakers? And even if you do connect them, the wire restricts usage of the mobile device.
I resorted to buying Bluetooth enabled speakers, but one of the biggest problems with BT speakers is pairing and unpairing. In most cases you can pair only with one device and then it’s quite unintuitive to switch between devices.
A neater option is to get inexpensive receivers that support wireless technologies like AirPlay. And that’s what Chromecast Audio does.
Setting up the device is extremely easy; just plug in the power cable and connect it with speakers through the 3.5mm port. Once connected you can easily stream music from services that support Chromecast Audio.
Unlike Bluetooth speakers you can enable guest mode and then anyone within the wireless network can play music through Chromecast Audio without hassle.
The biggest problem with Chromecast Audio is that it's exclusively cloud based. Google’s own apps like Music won’t play songs that are stored on your device’s hard drive.
If you are on devices like iPhone or iPad then you can’t ‘stream’ content from Apple Music or Apple Movies app. I was not able to ‘stream’ any music from Amazon Music, Apple Music or other such sources.
One workaround on Android devices, for unsupported services, is that you use the ‘Cast’ button from settings and ‘stream’ any audio coming out of your devices. However that won’t work with iOS and probably some Android devices as well.
If you live inside Google’s bubble and all of your content is on cloud, then Chromecast Audio is the best thing to do. It’s not a great solution if you have a heterogenous environment at home.
I bought one because it’s cheap. So my suggestion is if you do want wireless playback capability, then get one. At $35 it doesn’t hurt to have one sitting around.
This article is published as part of the IDG Contributor Network. Want to Join?
iPhone 6s Plus vs. Nexus 6: One Android user's surprising takeNext Post
No, Google isn't 'secretly' storing your voice
Nvidia's new 3GB version of the GeForce GTX 1060 goes toe-to-toe with the $200 Radeon RX 480—in theory.
The Apple Pencil is an amazing tool for taking notes, and in this roundup you'll find nine of the best...
Garmin's vivoactive HR and Fitbit's Surge fitness watches both cost $250, and they have many similar...
The beverage company removed the interim tag from Barry Simpson, who had led IT since July. Simpson is...
The highest paid CIOs made big bucks this year, but received only modest increases. How did the rest of...
If Silicon Valley really cared about 'diversity' and'"inclusion,' they'd get rid of people like Peter...
T-Mobile says it will give customers $325 if they bring their own Google Pixel phones to its network....