Offering regional and national programs, CIO (and CSO) events bring together some of the most respected names and thought leaders in information technology and security. Presented by CIOs and other senior level executives, these invitation-only programs offer timely topics and strong networking. Learn More »
Public Council Teleconference: Application Rationalization — Hidden Costs and Smart Decisions
November 17 at 11:00 am US/Eastern (GMT-5)
Join Honorio Padrón, of The Hackett Group, who will share the drivers for companies to tackle application rationalization and the results of research that define the hidden cost of complexity. Additionally, we will discuss key decision milestones—to start or not, holding the course steady and fulfilling expectations.
Virtual Desktop Cost-Benefit Analysis — Michael Jacobs, Catlin Group
The analysis contained in this presentation measures the cost of everything from the machines and licenses to the infrastructure for virtual vs. traditional desktop environments.
Honor your best senior team members - Apply for the CIO Ones to Watch Award
Get well-earned public recognition for your top up-and-coming team members, your IT organization and your enterprise. Award winners will be announced, publicized and feted in May 2010, great timing to help attract new IT recruits to your company.
Learn more about the CIO Executive Council »May 01, 2002 — CIO —
THERE’S A GREAT SCENE in the 1983 comedy Trading Places when the main character, a snooty commodities broker played by Dan Aykroyd, gets fired and is forced to pawn his expensive wristwatch.
"This is a Roche Vouceau," Aykroyd’s character tells the Philadelphia pawnbroker. "The finest water-resistant watch in the world. Singularly unique, sculptured in design, handcrafted in Switzerland and water-resistant to three atmospheres. This is the sports watch of the ’80s. $6,955 retail!"
"You got a receipt?" the pawnbroker asks.
"It tells time simultaneously in Monte Carlo, Beverly Hills, London, Paris, Rome and Gstaad," Aykroyd replies.
"In Philadelphia," says the pawnbroker, "it’s worth 50 bucks."
Philadelphia pawnshops aren’t the only places where value is subject to debate. When it comes to business technology these days, companies are asking hard questions about outlays for new initiatives.
Many companies stopped asking tough questions during the tech-spending frenzy of the late 1990s. Having resigned themselves to spending large sums on Y2K compliance, companies soon jumped on the consultant-driven bandwagon for the Internet "revolution." No one asked, "What’s the return on this project?"?if they did, they were treated as bean counters with no vision.
During the last two years, we’ve seen the pendulum swing again. In an era of tight budgets and slower growth, technology’s hottest toys aren’t worth much today unless they deliver real value to the business.
From my perspective as a CEO, the operative question in assessing IT value is, Value from whose point of view? Customers, the folks in the back office and shareholders don’t always have a common view of what constitutes a good technology investment.
Customers. In the eyes of your customers, any technology initiative is worthwhile if it makes your company easier and more convenient to deal with. Take the most visible manifestation of technology in business: the Web channel, where your customers come to learn about your company and buy its products and services. In the investment industry, clients clamored for online account access and got it, even though it might not have been in their best interest. Easy trading can tempt investors to buy and sell excessively, often turning a big nest egg into a small one.
Employees. The people who work with you define technology value differently. To them, the most worthwhile initiatives are those that make their job more interesting or free them up to perform more value-added tasks. In the investment industry, the advent of automated transaction capabilities a decade ago meant that our people no longer had to manually process every purchase, redemption or exchange. Instead, they could process by exception, focusing on transactions that required special attention.