Offering regional and national programs, CIO (and CSO) events bring together some of the most respected names and thought leaders in information technology and security. Presented by CIOs and other senior level executives, these invitation-only programs offer timely topics and strong networking. Learn More »
June 17, 11:30 AM - 12:30 PM U.S./ET (GMT-4)
Larry Bonfante, CIO of the U.S. Tennis Association, will discuss the skills and approaches that your rising IT leaders must learn to be effective in an executive capacity.
How to Handle Your New CEO: Managing Turnover at the Top
June 18, 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM U.S./Eastern (GMT-4)
Turbulent times have increased turnover at the top. Find out what Council CIOs have done to "break in" new CEOs—build relationships, set expectations, educate on the role of IT.
Mid-Market CIO Panel: Tips and Techniques for Improving Vendor Relationships
July 15, 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM U.S./Eastern (GMT-4)
We'll highlight relationship priorities and best practices identified in a Council study, and we'll interact with a CIO panel on the approaches they've used to improve strategic vendor partnerships.
Executive Competencies Assessment Tool
Assess Your Business Leadership Skills with the Council's new benchmarking tool. Rate yourself in change leadership, strategy, customer focus and more.
Learn more about the CIO Executive Council »Apply today for a FREE subscription to CIO Magazine!
May 01, 2003 — CIO —
More and more, the problems that earn CIOs their paychecks revolve around making it easier for users to explore huge volumes of data. They do this through finding known objects in huge search spaces, assembling top-down overviews that summarize the important points of a topic, and helping searchers decide what they really want when their initial search ideas are confused, misguided or ambiguous.
At one time, researchers speculated that solving such search problems might require artificial intelligence: systems that simulated human thought and could behave like skilled reference librarians. But there is an easier solution?ordering data into categories and subcategories and then having users interact with that structure before looking at the raw results. Consider a hungry New Yorker looking for a place to eat. A search under "New York AND restaurant" that returned only a list of actual eateries would be too long. On the other hand, if the results came packaged in an easy-to-scan collection of restaurant types?Italian, French, Asian and, if necessary, subtypes under that: Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese and so on?the whole set of New York restaurants suddenly becomes navigable.
Categorization also helps with other issues. It solves the overview problem by formatting different categories (restaurant types, locations, price ranges, ratings) side by side, presenting the searcher with a multifaceted, top-down perspective. The same formatting trick helps searchers who don’t quite know what they want by letting them examine query results from several angles at once, interactively.
Category trees are not new. Until recently, however, IT applications required paid humans to think up the category names, define their relationships and write the rules that channeled data into the proper boxes. As a result, the technique was limited to fields with big budgets, such as financial analysis or defense. During the past few years, however, several developments have made it much easier to automate or at least semiautomate categorization, sparking a small revolution in the sophistication of enterprise-level search engines and the number and kinds of users a system can help.
These systems, however, are not exactly plug and play (at least today) and may require significant time to establish rules that ultimately create the final categories. But with proper investment, autocategorization tools can reap significant benefits.
In 2000, components distributor Arrow Electronics built and started to sell subscriptions to Ubiquidata, a components database made up of information about more than 23 million items, each with as many as 50 related data elements. The company initially marketed the product to purchasing and material planning professionals within original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). For clients such as those, searching the huge data set was no problem, since they usually knew exactly what they were after, often right down to the manufacturer’s part number.