Offering regional and national programs, CIO (and CSO) events bring together some of the most respected names and thought leaders in information technology and security. Presented by CIOs and other senior level executives, these invitation-only programs offer timely topics and strong networking. Learn More »
Public Council Teleconference: Application Rationalization — Hidden Costs and Smart Decisions
November 17 at 11:00 am US/Eastern (GMT-5)
Join Honorio Padrón, of The Hackett Group, who will share the drivers for companies to tackle application rationalization and the results of research that define the hidden cost of complexity. Additionally, we will discuss key decision milestones—to start or not, holding the course steady and fulfilling expectations.
Virtual Desktop Cost-Benefit Analysis — Michael Jacobs, Catlin Group
The analysis contained in this presentation measures the cost of everything from the machines and licenses to the infrastructure for virtual vs. traditional desktop environments.
Honor your best senior team members - Apply for the CIO Ones to Watch Award
Get well-earned public recognition for your top up-and-coming team members, your IT organization and your enterprise. Award winners will be announced, publicized and feted in May 2010, great timing to help attract new IT recruits to your company.
Learn more about the CIO Executive Council »July 16, 2008 — IDG News Service —
The debate over its recently approved snooping law continues to rage unabated in Sweden. Centrum för rättvisa (or Center for Justice), a Swedish public interest law organization, has lodged a complaint with the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), it announced on Wednesday.
The Swedish parliament voted on June 18 to approve a law that will make it possible for the FRA (Swedish Defense Radio Establishment), a civilian organization that falls under the Ministry of Defense, to listen in on all wired traffic that crosses Swedish borders to protect against what has been dubbed "external threats."
Centrum för rättvisa feels the law (also known as the FRA Act), as well as current monitoring of wireless traffic, constitutes a violation of the right to privacy and private life (Article 8), and the right to an effective remedy (Article 13), as protected by the European Convention on Human Rights, according to a statement.
The law has several shortcomings, which the ECHR needs to take a look at, according to Centrum för rättvisa, which questions whether it will be effective since encryption can be used to evade eavesdropping.
The group also says that the FRA Act is too vague. Reasons for monitoring communications range broadly and include preventing crimes as varied as international terrorism and interest speculation. It is also not specific about how the information gathered is monitored, used, shared and stored, or how the information should be erased.
Last but not least, individuals who suspect they have been the subject to surveillance have no way to confirm it, and therefore lack an effective remedy, according to Centrum för rättvisa.