Offering regional and national programs, CIO (and CSO) events bring together some of the most respected names and thought leaders in information technology and security. Presented by CIOs and other senior level executives, these invitation-only programs offer timely topics and strong networking. Learn More »
Webcast: In the Google Apps Cloud: How to Achieve Your Business Objectives
Dec 3rd, '09, 1 - 2 pm US/Eastern (GMT-5)
Join Council member Brent Hoag, Director, Global IT, at JohnsonDiversey, as he discusses the adoption of Google Apps which has helped meet four corporate goals; sustainability, simplification, increased employee productivity and global collaboration.
Webcast: Collaboration Initiatives: Benchmarks & Best Practices
Dec 15th, '09, 4 - 5 pm US/Eastern (GMT-5)
Join Council members Ruth Thorpe, VP & CIO at the U.S. Pharmaceutical Operations of Sanofi-Aventis, and Gary Kuyper, CIO at Bethany Christian Services, as they speak about their collaboration initiatives and experiences in how and why they chose the social networking and collaboration tools they are using and their business goals for collaboration, and facing culture change challenges.
Data Overview: Collaboration Initiatives Field Guide: Benchmarks & Best Practices
This appendix to the Council Field Guide provides an analysis which discusses benchmarks for collaboration IT implementation costs, adoption rates and payoffs. The overview identifies top IT and business goals and satisfaction rates for collaboration initiatives as well as best practices and lessons learned for implementing collaboration IT.
Learn more about the CIO Executive Council »October 17, 2008 — IDG News Service —
A U.S. law that allows telecom carriers to be granted immunity in some suits alleging illegal government surveillance is unconstitutional, two civil-rights groups argued late Thursday.
In a brief filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and local affiliates of the American Civil Liberties Union argued that the FISA Amendments Act (FAA) violates the separation of powers in the U.S. government among the president, lawmakers and the courts. FAA is an extension of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which provides for a secret court to approve certain kinds of surveillance for national security. The groups' challenge is set to be heard Dec. 2.
EFF sued AT&T in 2006, alleging that the Bush administration had been conducting an illegal, warrantless wiretapping program with AT&T's help. The suit was a class action on behalf of AT&T's customers, whom the EFF said had suffered an invasion of privacy.
The wiretapping that allegedly was launched in the wake of Sept. 11 was overly broad, the EFF argued. The government has tried to keep the suit from being heard, arguing that it would endanger the country by bringing sensitive state secrets into the open. Several similar lawsuits have been consolidated before Judge Vaughn Walker at the U.S. District Court in San Francisco.
Earlier this year, Congress passed the FAA, which allows for carriers to be granted immunity from such suits. The law only required the U.S. attorney general to certify that the surveillance was allowed by certain laws, that the carriers had been given written directives that the surveillance was legal, or that the surveillance didn't take place as alleged, said Kevin Bankston, a senior staff attorney at EFF.
Attorney General Michael Mukasey filed both a public and a secret certification last month, and the Bush administration asked Judge Walker to dismiss the lawsuits. EFF and the ACLU affiliates, along with other parties in the lawsuits, filed the brief Thursday to keep the cases alive. After the Dec. 2 hearing, Bankston expects Judge Walker to decide in a timely manner whether to dismiss the suits. This is likely to be followed by an appeal from the losing side, Bankston added.
Giving the attorney general the power to issue that certification turns him into both judge and jury, Bankston said. Determining whether AT&T can be sued for alleged participation in illegal surveillance is the job of the courts, not Congress or the executive branch, he said.
"It strains credulity to believe that the same Attorney General who argued that immunity must be granted has fairly and completely weighed the interests of our clients," EFF Staff Attorney Ann Brick said in a prepared statement.