Offering regional and national programs, CIO (and CSO) events bring together some of the most respected names and thought leaders in information technology and security. Presented by CIOs and other senior level executives, these invitation-only programs offer timely topics and strong networking. Learn More »
Public Council Teleconference: Application Rationalization — Hidden Costs and Smart Decisions
November 17 at 11:00 am US/Eastern (GMT-5)
Join Honorio Padrón, of The Hackett Group, who will share the drivers for companies to tackle application rationalization and the results of research that define the hidden cost of complexity. Additionally, we will discuss key decision milestones—to start or not, holding the course steady and fulfilling expectations.
Virtual Desktop Cost-Benefit Analysis — Michael Jacobs, Catlin Group
The analysis contained in this presentation measures the cost of everything from the machines and licenses to the infrastructure for virtual vs. traditional desktop environments.
Honor your best senior team members - Apply for the CIO Ones to Watch Award
Get well-earned public recognition for your top up-and-coming team members, your IT organization and your enterprise. Award winners will be announced, publicized and feted in May 2010, great timing to help attract new IT recruits to your company.
Learn more about the CIO Executive Council »December 08, 2008 — IDG News Service —
The U.S. government should overhaul its approach to cybersecurity, with sweeping new regulations on private businesses and a new, centralized cybersecurity office in the White House, an all-star group of experts recommended Monday.
The White House office is needed because the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is not equipped to protect the U.S. government against cyber attacks, according to the report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies' (CSIS) Commission on Cybersecurity for the 44th Presidency. Many members of the commission "felt that leaving any cyber function at DHS would doom that function to failure," according to the report.
In addition, the report calls for new government regulations focused on protecting U.S. networks. Many of those regulations would focus on refining government efforts to protect its own cyber infrastructure, but regulations on private industry are needed as well, the report said.
The report rejected the market-driven approach to cybersecurity advanced by U.S. President George Bush. "The strategy essentially abandoned cyber defense to ad hoc market forces," the report said. "In no other area of national security do we depend on private, voluntary efforts. We believe that cyberspace cannot be secured without regulation."
New regulations are needed for the IT, finance and energy industries, as well as for supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems, the report said. In addition, the U.S. government needs to change its acquisition rules to focus more on cybersecurity, and the U.S. needs to require identity authentication credentials in the IT, energy and finance industries, as well as in government services.
The government also should allow private residents to use government-issued cyber credentials for their online activities, the report recommended.
The report suggests the U.S. government has several major steps it needs to take to address cybersecurity deficiencies. "Cybersecurity is among the most serious economic and national security challenges we will face in the 21st century," wrote James Lewis, director of the CSIS Technology and Public Policy Program. "Our research and interviews for this report made it clear that we face a long-term challenge in cyberspace from foreign intelligence agencies and militaries, criminals, and others, and that this struggle will wreak serious damage on the economic health and national security of the U.S. unless we respond vigorously."
DHS, which has been the lead agency focused on cybersecurity, can be strengthened, the report said. But "the nature of our opponents, the attacks we face in cyberspace, and the growing risk to national and economic security mean that comprehensive cybersecurity falls outside the scope of DHS's competencies," the report said. "DHS is not the agency to lead in a conflict with foreign intelligence agencies or militaries or even well-organized international cyber criminals."