Offering regional and national programs, CIO (and CSO) events bring together some of the most respected names and thought leaders in information technology and security. Presented by CIOs and other senior level executives, these invitation-only programs offer timely topics and strong networking. Learn More »
Public Council Teleconference: Application Rationalization — Hidden Costs and Smart Decisions
November 17 at 11:00 am US/Eastern (GMT-5)
Join Honorio Padrón, of The Hackett Group, who will share the drivers for companies to tackle application rationalization and the results of research that define the hidden cost of complexity. Additionally, we will discuss key decision milestones—to start or not, holding the course steady and fulfilling expectations.
Virtual Desktop Cost-Benefit Analysis — Michael Jacobs, Catlin Group
The analysis contained in this presentation measures the cost of everything from the machines and licenses to the infrastructure for virtual vs. traditional desktop environments.
Honor your best senior team members - Apply for the CIO Ones to Watch Award
Get well-earned public recognition for your top up-and-coming team members, your IT organization and your enterprise. Award winners will be announced, publicized and feted in May 2010, great timing to help attract new IT recruits to your company.
Learn more about the CIO Executive Council »May 27, 2009 — CIO —
Since Google's Chrome web browser launched last September, it has garnered a small market share (roughly one percent, depending on the study you read). Chrome has embraced a lot of principles that has made the Mozilla Firefox browser so popular: It's fast and open to web developers to improve it.
But Chrome has yet to replicate the extension of "add-on" features that allow normal users to embed more functionality on top of their browser, as Firefox has done so famously. Created by third-party developers, a typical add-on (or extension) might help you preview web-pages or view how many messages you have in your Gmail, for example.
Today, at the Google I/O conference in San Francisco, Aaron Boodman, a Google developer, confirmed to attendees that Google has accelerated its efforts to create an ecosystem of add-ons that customize the Chrome browser. Boodman says that Google is adamant about maintaining Chrome's minimalist and elegant design, while allowing add-ons to streamline the ability for users to access their favorite apps and web-pages more quickly.
While the presentation was very developer-based, I picked out some things to expect for the first iteration of Google Chrome extensions, which remain in pre-alpha (a tech term for "awhile" if you're a normal end-user).
Mozilla built out an incredible amount of add-ons for its browser, but it has at times crowded the browser's look and feel. Google wants extensions to compliment Chrome's elegant design by not capturing too much screen real-estate. Extensions will allow Chrome users to customize their browser if they want, but such features will likely never be added as default to Chrome.
"Chrome has a minimal, slick interface," Boodman says. "In order to keep it that way, we need to have a high bar for features that we add to Chrome. We won't add it for a majority, or a big majority of users. [It should be good for] nearly all users."
During the demo, Boodman displayed an add-on that allows users to track new stories in their Google RSS Reader. The add-on appeared on a bottom bar of his Chrome browser, suggesting that the real-estate at the top of the browser will remain reserved for bookmarks only, and not add-ons.
The buttons that users click on to use a Google extension will look similar to that of the bookmark buttons. Developers of extensions will utilize code that will give the buttons a similar feel for the end-user. When they highlight their mouse over an extension, it will illuminate the extension, with borders around it to separate it from others.
One of the things that makes Google Chrome a unique browser is that it was designed to run processes on apps and web pages at the same time. So, for instance, if you opened your Twitter feed in one tab, and Facebook in another, the browser won't favor one app just because you opened it first. It will automatically (and fairly) allocate power to running both apps.
Extensions will work the same. As you add extensions, and utilize them, the browser will fairly give them the power they need. This is also good from a security perspective, Boodman says. If one extension is riddled with malicious code, it will only affect that extension, not the other extensions or tabs.
The updates to extensions will happen instantly and in the background. Users will never be running antiquated extensions with outdated security. Security, in this case, is an automatic opt-in.
"We think this is good for users, and it's better for security," Boodman says.
According to Boodman, Google is "working on it," but he didn't specify when this would occur.