P2P Ban Plan for Government Gets Mixed Response
A proposal to introduce a bill seeking to formally ban the use of peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing applications on government and contractor networks is evoking a mixed response.
Thu, July 30, 2009
Computerworld — A proposal to introduce a bill seeking to formally ban the use of peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing applications on government and contractor networks is evoking a mixed response.
Rep. Edolphus Towns (D-NY) yesterday announced his intention to introduce such a bill, after he, and other members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee heard testimony about numerous highly sensitive government documents being found on P2P networks as a result of inadvertent leaks.
Examples of such leaks that were highlighted at the hearing included details on the President's motorcade routes and the First Family's safe house location -- to be used in a national emergency -- being found on P2P networks.
Towns, who is the chairman of the House oversight committee, said that the leaks pointed to a continuing failure by developers of P2P software to implement features for preventing inadvertent data disclosure on file-sharing networks.
He said that a ban on P2P use on government and contractor computers and networks had become necessary because the developers had so far shown themselves to be "unwilling or unable" to ensure P2P user safety. "Its time to put a referee on the field," he said at the hearing.
The idea is an "excellent" one, said Thomas Sydnor, a director at the Progress & Freedom Foundation, a Washington based think-tank. "The real questions are over how it gets implemented and by whom," Sydnor said.
Over the past few years there has been some debate in Washington over the need to regulate use of P2P software on government networks, because of data leak fears, he said.
A 2004 directive from the White House Office of Management and Budget recommends measures federal agencies for governing the use of P2P software on federal agency and contractor networks, he said.
The question now is whether the time has come to transition the directive into a formal law with Congressional oversight or let it remain an executive directive, he said.
The difference right now is that if a federal agency is not complying with the OMB directive it remains an executive branch concern. "The debate is whether it should be done by law or by directive," he said.
Either way, the time has come for greater oversight over the use of file-sharing tools on government and contractor networks, especially because more government workers are logging into to work from home, these days Sydnor said. Care needs to be taken to ensure that any law that is crafted not "sweep in" useful file-sharing technologies as well, he added.
