Data Masking Secures Sensitive Data in Non-Production Environments
Sensitive data is a part of every large organization's normal business practice. Allowing sensitive data from production applications to be copied and used for development and testing environments increases the potential for theft, loss or exposure -- thus increasing the organization's risk. Data masking is emerging as a best practice for obfuscating real data so it can be safely used in non-production environments. This helps organizations meet compliance requirements for PCI, HIPAA, GLBA and other data privacy regulations.
Fri, October 23, 2009
Network World — Last week's article covered the topic of protecting data in databases from the inside out. That is, watching every action involving data as it happens, and promptly halting improper actions. This week's article takes look at data masking, which another way to protect sensitive data, especially as it is being copied and used in the development and testing of applications.
Enterprise Data Security: Definition and Solutions
Data masking is the process of de-identifying (masking) specific elements within data stores by applying one-way algorithms to the data. The process ensures that sensitive data is replaced with realistic but not real data; for example, scrambling the digits in a Social Security number while preserving the data format. The one-way nature of the algorithm means there is no need to maintain keys to restore the data as you would with encryption or tokenization.
10 woeful tales of data gone missing
Data masking is typically done while provisioning non-production environments so that copies of data created to support test and development processes are not exposing sensitive information. If you don't think this is important, consider what happened to Wal-Mart a few years ago. Wired.com reports that Wal-Mart was the victim of a serious security breach in 2005 and 2006 in which hackers targeted the development team in charge of the chain's point-of-sale system and siphoned source code and other sensitive data to a computer in Eastern Europe. Many computers the hackers targeted belonged to company programmers. Wal-Mart at the time produced some of its own software, and one team of programmers was tasked with coding the company's point-of-sale system for processing credit and debit card transactions. This was the team the intruders targeted and successfully hacked.
Wal-Mart's situation may not be unique. According to Gartner, more than 80%t of companies are using production sensitive data for non-production activities such as in-house development, outsourced or off-shored development, testing, quality assurance and pilot programs.
The need for data masking is largely being driven by regulatory compliance requirements that mandate the protection of sensitive information and personally identifiable information (PII). For instance, the Data Protection Directive implemented in 1995 by the European Commission strictly regulates the processing of personal data within the European Union. Multinational corporations operating in Europe must observe this directive or face large fines if they are found in violation. U.S. regulations such as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) also call for protection of sensitive financial and personal data.
