20,000 Google employees recently orchestrated a global walkout after learning that the creator of Android was given $90 million upon his exit in the midst of at least one sexual harassment claim. The story that\u00a0was leaked to the New York Times\u00a0included a variety of other claims against leaders at the company, and so the protest took aim at a history of Google protecting executives accused of sexual harassment.\nProgress doesn\u2019t come without a fight\nThe details of these claims and outcomes weren\u2019t public before largely because of forced arbitration, the requirement for employees to\u00a0waive their right to sue and to instead settle workplace disputes through an arbitrator.\u00a0While\u00a0some companies have taken steps to remove arbitration requirements\u00a0from employment contracts, they\u2019re still quite pervasive across tech. But, after the walkout,\u00a0Google removed them, and\u00a0Facebook followed suit\u00a0a day later.\nIs this progress? Certainly, a 20,000-person walkout coordinated across locations around the world is a big statement, and two of tech\u2019s most powerful companies responded with action on what is one of the most important issues for women across industries (removal of arbitration clauses). But it begs the question why a walkout like this is required to compel companies to protect all their employees, not just the most elite and, most often, male executives.\nIt\u2019s because progress never comes without a fight, but a fight requires community. Consider some of the major movements throughout history: the civil rights movement, which was led by peaceful protestors but was met with violent action; the more recent LGBTQ movement that over the decades has required outspoken, courageous individuals to risk everything; and the women\u2019s suffrage movement, which required, among other things, hunger strikes. These movements embody both fight and community, the two key ingredients for progress. Today women are fighting for equal opportunity in the workplace, and it seems we may be on the precipice of a real movement.\nAnger can be a catalyst for change\nIt\u2019s interesting that we often use the word \u2018fight\u2019 to describe our work for women in tech. I always find it so combative, but the reality is that anger and frustration \u2013 that fight \u2013 is needed for a movement.\nConsider that the current movement for women in tech really started to gain momentum after Ellen Pao lost her suit against VC firm Kleiner Perkins. It underscored how sexual discrimination is hard to prove and how the status quo is hard to overcome, but it did something even more important. It seeded the anger required to start a movement.\nAmid the sometimes-toxic culture in tech, I\u2019m finding that women are creating and building new technologies and companies every day. But what I also find, without exception, is they have to fight for it. In one of the stories featured in The Chasing Grace Project\u2019s Episode #2 (premiering next week in New York) a woman is sued by a men\u2019s rights organization for hosting all-women events. In another story, a woman who is building self-defense technology for women is told by venture capitalists that they will invest in the company if her male co-founder will be the CEO. Yes, these things are still happening; in fact, they\u2019re quite pervasive.\nEllen was very much alone during her suit, splattered across the pages of the NYT, WSJ and other outlets with no one else but her attorney. The women I\u2019ve interviewed for our forthcoming episode about progress and community felt alone while in the midst of their fights. But what is beginning to change is that Ellen and others like her are no longer isolated. They are surrounded by community.\nThe power in community\nProgress can be hard to see. I don\u2019t see it yet in equal opportunity nor representation. Where I do see progress is in women coming together to build something else, something bigger than one technology or one company. The way in which community has manifested for women in tech is relatively new \u2013 women\u2019s affinity groups inside companies, groups like\u00a0Women Who Code\u00a0and\u00a0Tech Ladies\u00a0and\u00a0Ladies Get Paid\u00a0and many others have only just emerged in the last few years. And its these communities that can really help us recruit and retain women for the tech industry. It\u2019s very common today for young women who are interviewing with companies to ask, \u2018Do you have a women-in-tech group inside the company?\u2019 While still fairly new, these communities are already helping to give us all the strength and courage to step up and, if necessary, to walk out.\nThe 20,000 Google employees who walked out on November 1 are a community, a community of women and men who felt empowered to take this action in an environment where they feel increasingly supported to do so. The environment is being built not by companies but by the connected individuals and communities of women and men working on these important issues. The walkout is the result of this foundation that now exists.\u00a0\u00a0\nThere is so much power in that. When we feel alone, we tend to give up or check out. We lose confidence. We don\u2019t feel like we belong. And we accept that things will never change. But when we\u2019re a part of a community, a group of people with whom we connect and who we know has our back, we feel capable of doing anything. And everything.\nProgress on increasing the number of women in tech is painfully slow, but we see it in the women and men coming together to support each other. It is the sure sign of a movement, and a movement means change.