The 2017 State of the CIO report by CIO.com does an excellent job in reminding us of the eternal gap between the business and IT: While CIOs think of IT as a strategic business partner, business executives think of IT as an important, yet supporting, function. Is this a problem?\nNot necessarily. Functional specialization is an intended feature of the industrial era operating models designed for efficiency through scale; and the multi-decade-old business-IT gap is a textbook style illustration of this feature. Rather than being a problem, this gap represents a calculated equilibrium between efficiency and agility within the traditional enterprise IT context. Otherwise, it would have been long resolved since the term \u201cstrategic IT alignment\u201d first emerged at MIT 28 years ago.\nHowever today, the traditional enterprise IT model is disrupted by four revolutionary forces \u2014 digital, elevated CIO mandates, de-globalization and cloud computing. With the increasing emphasis on agility, the historic equilibrium of the business-IT relationship is now called into question. Consider the following:\n\nIT works hard to build new (digital) capabilities but is unable to convince the business to embrace them (mostly due to lack of articulated use cases, and to tension between centralized and business-aligned technology capabilities).\nIT budgets are locked in to pay for depreciation\/amortization, technical debt and fixed-cost operating environments, with little left to fund new (digital) development.\nDespite a broader adoption of modern techniques like agile, DevOps and XaaS, IT still can\u2019t deploy (digital) solutions fast enough.\n(Digital) funding decisions and consequent business outcomes are uncorrelated, and peanut-butter accounting doesn\u2019t help.\n(Digital) opportunities remain undervalued due to incomplete consideration of economic factors \u2014 justifying cloud benefits based on infrastructure savings only is a prime example.\n\nThese issues are not new, they just became way more costly and risky in the digital age. The business-IT relationship model is the primary management tool to address them, but the new enterprise IT mandate has fundamental implications on the traditional model, as illustrated here in Figure 1:\n Credit: Technology for Alpha LLC \nFigure 1: The implications of IT mandate on the business-IT relationships.\n\nInvesting in band-aid improvements \u2014 and thereby extending the life of the familiar, but increasingly unfit, traditional model \u2014 is one way of mitigating the rising costs and risks. Considering the transformation alternatives is another one. The overarching question is if the tipping point has been reached yet.\nTo determine if they are at a tipping point, business and IT executives can ask two questions: "Is there a viable alternative model for the business-IT relationship?" and "Is it worth the effort?"\nIs there a viable alternative model for the business-IT relationship?\nThe answer to the first question is yes, because it\u2019s part of a new enterprise IT operating model, called lean IT. The lean principles have been battle-tested in the manufacturing industry for decades, since the transition from mass manufacturing to lean manufacturing, and they are already utilized by enterprise IT as part of the agile development process, albeit at a limited scope and scale.\nWithin the context of business-IT interactions, lean IT differentiates itself from the traditional model in two ways:\n1. A direct link from IT decisions to business outcomes: The absence of a strong lineage from IT decisions to business outcomes has been the fundamental reason why enterprise IT had to remain as a support function for so long. With the broader adoption of digital approaches, methodologies and tools, like agile, DevOps and XaaS, there is a lot of new data generated during every business-IT interaction, which makes it possible to link individual IT decisions to measurable business outcomes.\n2. A culture of continuous improvement: In the traditional model, benchmarking is the primary means of performance management. Benchmarking works well when the goal is to ensure efficiency and reliability, but it is terrible in promoting agility and speed. Furthermore, benchmarking instills the feeling that achieving \u201cthe average\u201d constitutes success, whereas the new goal for IT is to be able to differentiate. Continuous improvement is the lean IT response to benchmarking. With continuous improvement, the race with self never ends.\nIn my view, the above two traits are paramount to the success of enterprise IT in the digital age. All other issues commonly associated with the business-IT gap \u2014 like ineffective collaboration, missing skills, lack of customer engagement, ever-changing requirements, inflexible culture \u2014 will be dispersed once IT decisions are linked to business outcomes and continuous improvement is embedded in the culture.\nIs it worth the effort?\nIn my previous articles, I estimated that lean IT can generate a 9% to 15% productivity improvement at the top line of enterprise IT. Just to put in perspective, this amount is roughly equal to the overall digital transformation budget at most enterprises, and it's twice as much of the savings possible through a multiyear, comprehensive, data center consolidation program.\nClearly, finding the pockets of productivity opportunities within the vast sea of an enterprise IT ecosystem is not a trivial task, but it\u2019s a viable and worthwhile undertaking:\n\nStart small with light-way, time-boxed opportunity assessments. A systemic look into existing IT practices and operational results would reveal where the best opportunities are.\nA well-guided program should grow commensurate to demonstrated business value potential, start generating value after six months and become cost-neutral within 12 months.\nExpected benefits include increased business impact of IT, a feasible migration path from legacy to digital, and a way to win back the commitment of a capable workforce.\nIndustry disruptions often brew slowly but decisively, and history shows that procrastinators are often penalized heavily \u2014 e.g., GM vs. Toyota, Blockbuster vs. Netflix and, most recently, Target vs. Amazon.\n\nIn summary, enterprise IT is disrupted, and business and IT leaders are facing an important decision: To transform or not to transform the way their respective organizations interact with each another. Maintaining the status quo with incremental enhancements and band-aids may feel safe for now, but it\u2019s potentially risky. It may be a wise insurance policy to start assessing what is really at stake with the existing business-IT relationship models to determine if they have crossed a tipping point yet.