Fox News screwed up when it fired Bill O\u2019Reilly. The guy was a money machine, worth billions to the company and they actually had to pay him millions to leave. It should have never gotten to the point where they had to fire the guy as there were very clear and expensive indications that he had a problem long before they parted ways.\nIn the process of failing, O\u2019Reilly also caused a number of highly productive women to leave or grow disenchanted with Fox News. This not only increased the total potential lost income to Fox, but it highlighted morale issues inside the company, and all of this could have been avoided.\nOften, those who come into power quickly end up misusing that power, despite indications early on that there will be a problem. Even though we have a saying about power and corruption, \u201cpower tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely,\u201d we should, but we don\u2019t put in place strong controls to prevent rather than punish this bad behavior. Even Steve Jobs was almost fired a second time from Apple and might have ended up in jail for abuse of power (in his case backdating his own options without board approval) and, without Jobs, Apple likely not only not been the most valuable company in the world, but it likely would have failed last decade.\u00a0\u00a0\n[ Related: Uber\u2019s CEO needs some serious mentoring \u2013 fast ]\nO\u2019Reilly isn\u2019t the only recent example, Uber\u2019s CEO is another of the latest examples of someone who got authority before he learned control and he may be responsible not only for creating the company, but eventually killing it as well.\u00a0\u00a0 This is all because we don\u2019t, as a matter of practice, put in place controls that are designed to prevent a misuse of power as opposed to rules that force draconian penalties for it. And we do a crappy job of training employees in both avoiding the behavior themselves and in how to deal with it in others.\nTo big to be fired\nAt the heat of this problem are two things: I mentioned the concept of power corrupting and the fact we don\u2019t seem to anticipate that, the other thing is that when someone gains that power there is this concept that they are too big to be fired. That not only doesn\u2019t prevent the behavior it makes it look like the company tacitly either approves it or will turn a blind eye to it. In the case of O\u2019Reilly, it was clear that he represented an unacceptable loss to the company if terminated and Fox paid millions in settlements to assure that wouldn\u2019t happen, which only delayed and increased the damage from the outcome.\nThe employee, O\u2019Reilly, likely figured that would happen every time because he is worth far more than the settlement. However, what generally isn\u2019t conveyed is that boards often change, managers change, and once this is done it makes the employee a target raising to unacceptable levels the exposure to the firm over time. So the reality is that one infraction may be too much and it was lucky they got one pass but they think they can use the same leverage every time thus, eventually, the firm has to terminate.\u00a0\u00a0 So rather than addressing the problem what often happens is that the firm just delays the termination outcome and maximizes the payouts and resulting damage.\nYou have to do whatever it takes stop the abuse, not just pay off the accusers.\nAssuring it never happens again: Removing the risk\nWhen someone moves into high authority for the first time they should be assessed for abuse of power potential. This shouldn\u2019t be difficult because folks with this tendency tend to develop a history of it. That assessment should lead to the application of a set of controls that will remove the opportunity for power abuse. This could range from direct oversite from the board, to an aid that always is with the employee but who has dual loyalties and also reports to management or the board.\n\n\t\n\nIn the case of sexual harassment this would typically mean that the employee would never be alone with a member of the opposite sex they weren\u2019t related to. Penalties would range from severe fines to unpaid leave and termination.\u00a0\u00a0 Once this kind of a charge sticks the employee is guilty until proven innocent and the firm has to work to eliminate even the opportunity for the appearance of harassment. Against the revenue that O\u2019Reilly generated a full-time handler would have been a trivial cost yet clearly that kind protection wasn\u2019t in place.\u00a0\u00a0\nOther kinds of common power abuse\nSexual harassment is only one type of power abuse that can eventually lead to avoidable termination. Others include general employee abuse, misuse of company assets, embezzlement, breach of security, substance abuse either on the job or affecting performance, padding expense reports, and extreme delegation (retiring in place). Here is a more comprehensive list.\nWith oversite, classes, and targeted mitigation efforts you can generally prevent the damage that can be caused by a senior employee who abuses power and the combination of classes and monitoring early in an employee\u2019s career can either help prevent or eliminate this behavior.\nPower and abuse too often go hand in hand\nPeople who abuse power often rationalize that abuse, but while some have completed a career with much penalty the combination of social media and web resources to address these problems by employees has clearly changed that dynamic. If you are abusing your power or being abused you need to seek help because the career and emotional damage can be extreme.\nIf you are in authority realize that a significant percentage of your most valued employees either are or will abuse their power and either damage other employees, the company, or force you to terminate them. All outcomes are unacceptable and if you don\u2019t have a plan in place to identify and eliminate this abuse it\u2019ll likely bite you in the butt like it just did Fox.\nSo, like all problems, with abuse of power, you have two choices. Identify and eliminate it, or pray that when it is discovered you survive it. I\u2019ll say this, life is short and I\u2019ve worked in abusive environments and also in ones that didn\u2019t tolerate abuse. Any time in the former is too long and in the latter not long enough. But you don\u2019t want to be Bill O\u2019Reilly, Bill O\u2019Reilly\u2019s manager, or one of his employees, all of them are likely screwed now -- and this was a fixable problem. However, instead of fixing it, they dealt with the symptoms, and that rarely ends well.\nIn the end, there is a lesson here, and that is that the business cost of a person in power abusing it is often far greater than can be easily measured.\u00a0\u00a0 Assuring this doesn\u2019t happen is generally the far better, and cheaper, option. Just covering it up, in today\u2019s connected world, is far too risky to even consider anymore.