After recently watching two major product presentations from firms that have been doing them for decades, it struck me that folks seem to have forgotten the three basic rules on how to do these things well. Many books have been written on this subject, one of the best being \u201cThe Presentations Secrets of Steve Jobs.\u201d In addition, there are folks who specialize in training people on how to do this.\u00a0\u00a0\nSo this week I\u2019d like to cover three product launch presentation secrets that firms often forget.\n1. The goal is to sell the product.\nYour goal isn\u2019t give an executive facetime in front of an audience, it\u2019s not to train an employee on public speaking and it\u2019s not to see how many words can be put on a single slide.\nMuch like if you were picking a cast for a play you want to do well, you don\u2019t pick based on who they know or what their title is. You pick based on how well they can play the role. Every firm has folks who are naturals in front of audiences and, with a little training and practice, these same folks can be magical on stage telling stories, conveying excitement and motivating people to want to buy the product.\u00a0\u00a0 Often a product can live or die based on the quality of the presentation. Assuring your best person is presenting, much like ensuring your best actor is the lead in a play, goes a long way to achieving that goal.\n2. Maintain customer context.\nOften I see presentations that are all speeds and feeds. \u201cOur feeblefaxor is three times faster than our old feeblefaxor and twice as fast as the competition!\u201d means absolutely nothing unless you explain why anyone should want a fast feeblefaxor.\nThe cadence should be to first identify a customer-sourced problem, then explain why it is a problem and its importance. And finally, apply the metric or technology to the problem, and close with a customer testimonial on why they are thrilled with the result. For instance, there is a breakout of zombie gerbils and feeblefaxors have proven the most effective at eradicating the menace. Meanwhile, zombie gerbils are multiplying 2x what your competitor\u2019s feeblefaxor can kill, thus one that operates at 2x performance is more attractive to those needing to eradicate zombie gerbils which, I hope, can never be a thing. If you don\u2019t give the feature or metric context you won\u2019t hit the customer where they live.\n3. You have to entertain.\nToday\u2019s audiences have a ton of distractions: laptops, tablets, smartphones, apps, email, instant messages and so on. More than ever before you have to entertain them. This isn\u2019t about filling time or just getting to the end of the event. If you can\u2019t hold the audience it doesn\u2019t matter what your content is because they will likely never remember seeing it. I\u2019ve seen vendors pay thousands to bring customers to some exotic remote location to pitch a product or service only to have the only thing those customers remember is the location and extracurricular activities. They simply zoned out during the meeting, much like you or I would zone out in a presentation on time shares we were taking in order to get a free trip.\nThis is the thing that made a Steve Jobs presentation stand out, it was staged like you\u2019d stage a show with the product as the star. I recall one time leaving one of his events praising the hell out of it, only to suddenly realize he hadn\u2019t really presented anything new. And I never checked email or took my eyes off the stage because I didn\u2019t want to miss a minute of it. If you don\u2019t entertain you won\u2019t hold the audience, and if you don\u2019t hold the audience you could have saved a lot of money by just suggesting they take that nap at home.\u00a0\u00a0\n3 mistakes companies make when pitching products\nThere are three common mistakes firms make when pitching a product or service. They pick presenters on anything but what they should pick them for, presentation and sales skills.\u00a0\u00a0 They forget to provide customer-sourced context for their features and metrics and, without context, they are largely meaningless. And, finally, they fail to entertain which means to folks in the audience likely get a ton of work done they could have done more effectively, and from your perspective, far cheaper back in their homes or offices.\u00a0\u00a0\nOh, and I have one more thing. Measure the result, not on customer satisfaction, but on how well you accomplished the goals that gave you the budget for the event. The goal isn\u2019t to get the customer to rank the presentation, the goal is to change an impression or sell a product. I get you want a goal you can easily achieve but that doesn\u2019t pay the bills and, if you don\u2019t pay the bills, you\u2019ll likely find retirement comes far earlier than you expect.\u00a0\u00a0\nNow, excuse me, suddenly I have a deep need to buy a few feeblefaxors.