Despite an amusing report to the contrary, Apple's main motivation behind the release of its first smartwatch was not to improve the overall health of its customer base and change modern healthcare. If you think Apple’s goal with the Apple Watch was to boldly enter the burgeoning smartwatch market with a sleek-looking gadget that oozes cool factor, and then slowly steal market share, shape consumer expectations and methodically Hoover up dollars in a quest for (even more) obscene profitability, you are embarrassingly mistaken — at least according to a new article on Time.com, titled “The real reason Apple made the Apple Watch.” Time.com columnist Tim Bajarin wants you to believe Apple’s ultimate aim with its smartwatch is “to make its customers healthier and help reform the healthcare system.” An admirable and grand plan, no? Sure, but it also sounds a lot like Apple marketing material. SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe Apple Watch an average fitness tracker at best The Time.com post includes some insightful details about Apple’s ongoing Watch development. For example, Bajarin writes: “For 12 hours a day, six days a week, Apple brings in Apple employees of every shape, condition and ethnicity to do various exercises and monitor them with the most sophisticated medical systems available. Apple has seven full-time nurses in the facility I visited, using medical monitoring equipment that can determine all types of heath [sic] related data points. The lab even has special chambers that can simulate temperate and weather conditions, in which various exercises or activities can be monitored.” [Related: Why Apple Watch is a business traveler’s best friend] The author suggests Apple Watch came as a direct result of founder Steve Jobs’s struggles with pancreatic cancer and his related interactions with the modern healthcare system. Bajarin refers to Apple Watch’s “exceptional health related tracking, monitoring and motivational functions,” and writes that, “[w]hile fitness trackers are great, it takes something like the Apple Watch and a serious platform and ecosystem of compatible devices to deliver on things like HealthKit, ResearchKit and CareKit, all designed to create and gather the kind of information that could be used in monitoring users’ personal medical needs.” Ironically, these statements spotlight exactly what’s wrong with the current iteration of Apple Watch, because it’s health tracking is decidedly average compared to other high-end fitness devices, and Apple’s closed ecosystem means it doesn’t integrate with some of the most popular fitness apps. You kind of have to wonder whether Bajarin has ever used an Apple Watch … Better Apple Watch = more paying customers I stayed up way past my bedtime on the evening, nay morning, Apple first listed its smartwatch for online presale — 3 a.m. ET to be exact — to ensure that I’d get my Watch as soon as possible. And since I received it almost a year ago, I can count on one hand the days I have not worn my Watch. In other words, I’ve been aboard the Apple Watch bandwagon since day 1. You might even say I’m a “power user.” But I’m also a bit disappointed the company hasn’t added any significant new health features to my $400 device during the past year. The reality is that while Apple’s Watch may have more smartwatch features than top-of-the-line trackers, such as advanced notifications and broad app support, its sensors aren’t exactly scientific; it lacks many common features, including a leaderboard of friends — largely considered the single most motivational fitness tracker capability; and it relies on the iPhone for other functionality, such as GPS for location and distance tracking. In fact, it’s difficult to come up with any sort of significant Apple Watch fitness features that aren’t available on another, cheaper fitness watch or health band. Apple is also far from the only company throwing money at fitness gadgets and related software. Samsung, for example, announced in late April that its KNOX security platform will soon be used to protect sensitive health information Galaxy owners store in the S Health app. Perspective on Apple Watch and health tracking I’ll take off my Boston Jaded Journalists cap for a minute here and recognize that the Apple Watch is the company’s first attempt at a fitness tracker. Apple is clearly doing a lot of work behind the scenes on the health platforms Bajarin mentioned. The very first iPhone wasn’t exactly impressive compared to other smartphones of the late 2000s, but it proved to be incredibly popular and the driving force behind Apple’s staggering profitability — and, ironically, the reason why its revenue decreased for the first time in 13 years last quarter. It’s safe to say the best is yet to come for Apple Watch. However, it’s simply naive to believe Apple’s goal with the Watch was to make the world a better place. The real reasons Apple made the Apple Watch are the same reasons it makes any product: money, market share and additional hooks into its proprietary ecosystem. Any other happy accidents, such as healthier customers, that come as a result are just icing on the ca … err, low-fat dressing on the kale salad. AS Related content opinion Tom Brady's pricey PJs pack 'recovery tech' for athletes Under Armour's new TB12 pajamas aren't cheap, but they promise to rejuvenate your body after workouts. And they just might work, according to a study from the U.S. National Institutes of Health. By Al Sacco Jan 05, 2017 2 mins Health and Fitness Software Wearables Consumer Electronics opinion Budweiser 'smart' beer fridge encourages drinking on the job The new 'Bud-E Fridge' IoT smart refrigerator automatically orders more beer for you and your coworkers when supplies get low, and it's available for a limited time for free, if you're located in Chicago, New York or Los Angeles. By Al Sacco Dec 06, 2016 2 mins Media and Entertainment Industry Internet of Things Consumer Electronics opinion Why Samsung should release a Note 8 Samsung denies reports that it's planning to release another Note smartphone, but it would be a major misstep for the company to do away with what is perhaps its most important smartphone brand. Here's why. By Al Sacco Oct 26, 2016 4 mins Small and Medium Business Technology Industry Smartphones news analysis Google makes more than Samsung, Apple on flagship phone The price Google charges for its Pixel XL smartphone is closer to what it costs to make the phone than what both Samsung and Apple charge for the GS7 and iPhone 7, but Google still makes more money. Here's why. By Al Sacco Oct 25, 2016 3 mins Small and Medium Business iPhone Manufacturing Industry Podcasts Videos Resources Events SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe