Netflix says some of its customers use VPNs to access restricted content, so the company blocked the tech, raising questions about the ethical implications of location 'spoofing.' Credit: Reuters/Gonzalo Fuentes If you’re a privacy-minded Internet citizen, you may well use a VPN to essentially create a secure and anonymous connection between your browser and the Web. But not everybody likes VPNs. China’s repressive government, for instance, hates VPNs and blocks them because it thinks the tech weakens the country’s control over the Internet. Netflix, the most popular video streaming service in the world, now uses a similar tactic. Today, Netflix blocks users who try to access the service via a VPN connection. Why Netflix is anti VPN — for now Unlike China, Netflix does’t want to keep people in the dark. It does, however, have an interest in honoring contractual agreements with content partners that insist the movies and TV shows they lease to Netflix can only be viewed by consumers in certain countries. To skirt this roadblock, some Netflix subscribers use VPNs and proxy services to “spoof” Netflix servers into thinking the people are in different countries. After Netflix caught on to the trick, it started to block VPNs. When the issue surfaced earlier this year, Netflix explained its position and said it is working to eliminate geographical restrictions, but until it can, it will continue to block VPNs and proxy services. (The company didn’t respond to a request for additional details.) The ethical rights and wrongs of the skirmish between Netflix and some of its subscribers aren’t black and white. On the one hand, Netflix has to honor its licensing agreements with its partners, and subscribers who make an end run around those agreements are arguably pirating content. On the other hand, many people who use VPNs say they simply want to protect their privacy and believe they should have the right to do so. Netflix, VPNs and privacy Advocacy group OpenMedia takes the privacy-friendly stance, and it launched a petition asking Netflix to rescind its VPN ban. More than 46,000 people already signed it. OpenMedia acknowledges Netflix’s need to protect its IP but also believes VPNs are important utilities: “VPNs are one of the best and most accessible tools that Internet users have to protect our privacy. Whether it’s from malicious criminal activities, government surveillance and censorship, or simply connecting to a weakly-secured hotel Wi-Fi system, our personal and private digital information is constantly being put at risk and made vulnerable online.” Not surprisingly, VPN providers also have strong opinions on the subject. NordVPN reached out to various media outlets with a statement in support OpenMedia’s stance, for example, and it also offered a free “emergency VPN.” Obviously, NordVPN’s offer is in its own best interest, but I asked the company if it is aware of customers using its service to engage in Netflix piracy and received the following statement from a spokesperson: “Since we don’t store user logs, we have no way of detecting the behaviors of our customers, but from user comments and inquiries we know that NordVPN is used for privacy first, and then for accessing global content online.” Other services are even more upfront about their ability to access restricted content. Unblockus, a $4.99-a-month proxy service, clearly states on its website that it does exactly what its name implies: “We give you an address where the content you want is available. It’s like moving your computer or other device without actually moving it.” Again, the issue isn’t cut and dry. An ideal resolution will come only when Netflix no longer has to block certain content due to licensing issues and can drop its ban on privacy-enhancing tech. Given the prevalence of snooping by government agencies and other bad actors, consumers who value privacy are wise to consider the use of VPNs. Piracy, however, is wrong, and people who use VPNs to purposefully access blocked Netflix programming should at least consider the ethical implications of their actions. Related content opinion Consumers love to hate the companies that deliver pay TV and broadband A survey of thousands of consumers shows that a lack of competition and u201cabysmalu201d customer service make cable companies and ISPs the most disliked industries in the country. By Bill Snyder May 24, 2017 3 mins Broadband Consumer Electronics opinion Get ready to say goodbye to T-Mobile A Japanese conglomerate wants to buy T-Mobile and merge it with Sprint. What a disaster for consumers that will be. By Bill Snyder May 12, 2017 4 mins Small and Medium Business Consumer Electronics Mobile opinion Cunning hack attacks built-in Windows anti-malware software Quick action by Google and Microsoft appears to have put out the fire. But itu2019s another reminder that running old versions of Windows can be dangerous. By Bill Snyder May 10, 2017 2 mins Small and Medium Business Malware Windows Security opinion How to survive a move when your ISP can’t go with you Moving is a huge hassle, but hereu2019s a two-step solution that will keep you connected to the Internet without busting your budget. By Bill Snyder May 05, 2017 4 mins Internet Consumer Electronics Podcasts Videos Resources Events SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe