HP's Botched OpenWorld Keynotes: What Went Wrong

The Twittersphere erupted with negative comments while two top HP execs spoke at Oracle OpenWorld this week--but was this disaster preventable? Yes, says one presentation expert.

Twitter can be as socially brutal as a middle school playground: Half-baked opinions are delivered by some people with questionable authority; reputations may be altered forever with a single sentence; and gossip serves as a valuable form of currency.

Two HP executives who presented at Oracle OpenWorld 2010 conference felt the full force of Twitter's instantaneous sharing Sunday night—even though the execs hadn't a clue that the OpenWorld Twitter stream (#oow) had turned on them.

The HP executives—Ann Livermore, EVP of HP's enterprise business, and David Donatelli, EVP of enterprise servers, storage and networking—were subject to an onslaught of barbs and negative sentiment during their times on the Moscone Center's big stage.

The essence of the tweets: That the presentations were tedious "infomercials" from HP, remarkably similar to those from the year previous, and just plain boring.

Oracle OpenWorld Ann Livermore

Taken as a whole, the tweets were not petty, however, and the virtual crowd wasn't hostile. It's just many tech people either thought Livermore's and Donatelli's content was not interesting, or the two execs did not present their speeches particularly well. (A sample missive: "For two years now, having HP keynote at #oow10 is like having your ex-wife offer an awkward toast at your 2nd wedding.")

By the close of both presentations, thousands of in-person attendees had left Moscone North Hall D, and a new Twitter hashtag was born: #keynotetorture.

The headline of one blog post summed up the Twitter Tempest quite well: The Day HP Got Killed. Publicly. By HP.

Is Tech Too Boring?

For some in the audience, it seems as if they were transported back to middle school—when the substitute teacher was in charge, and all the kids were able to pass notes around without fear of being disciplined. It was, for all intents and purposes, open season on HP.

Conspiracy theories abounded: For instance, maybe the HP execs were boring on purpose, just to get back at Oracle for all that went down with the acrimonious Mark Hurd hiring? (Seems unlikely.)

There's probably a less sinister reason: Could it just be that this stuff—servers, storage, databases, networks—simply doesn't translate well to big-time, big-stage presentations?

Oracle OpenWorld Dave

Let's face it: Very few of these large conference presentations are very good. (Even Larry Ellison's keynote after HP's received a few negative tweets.) Of course, any type of public speaking is not for the weary, never mind doing it before 40,000 people who are a hands-length away from a BlackBerry. And execs' PowerPoint slides are either too busy or too confusing when simplicity is needed.

[ IMAGES: Courtesy of Hartmann Studios / Oracle]

1 2 Page 1
Page 1 of 2
The CIO Fall digital issue is here! Learn how CIO100 award-winning organizations are reimagining products and services for a new era of customer and employee engagement.