The First Amendment makes it difficult for U.S. states to crack down on inappropriate online content, but social media companies should shoulder more responsibility for the abuse that takes place on their sites. Twitter this week changed its rules to ban the sharing of so-called “revenge porn.” That’s a good thing. But what took so long? Revenge porn, or the posting of intimate pictures without a subject’s consent, is just another part of the ugly, often misogynistic, dark side of social media. People are frequently bullied, shamed, intimated, and threatened by creeps who hide behind the Internet’s curtain of anonymity. Sometimes revenge porn victims are famous, such as actress Jennifer Lawrence, but more often they’re ordinary people who used bad judgment and let someone untrustworthy take or hold onto an intimate photo. Very real First Amendment issues are at play here, which is one reason why states (California is an exception) have been hesitant to pass laws that punish people who post revenge porn or the sites that host it. Remember, however, that the First Amendment is directed at the government, and it says that government may not abridge free speech or the rights of the press. It does not mean that other entities don’t have the rights to make rules about appropriate speech — or in this case, tweets. If you, like some police officers in Ferguson, Mo., use your company email to write disparaging or racist comments about a colleague, you could be fired. But you couldn’t be arrested; the act is not illegal. When you take that into consideration, it’s even more important for social media sites to enforce reasonable standards of conduct. Until this week, Twitter did nothing about revenge porn, even though its CEO, Dick Costolo, admitted that he knew his company had a serious problem. In an internal email leaked to The Verge, Costolo wrote, “We suck at dealing with abuse and trolls on the platform and we’ve sucked at it for years.” Here’s the recent update to the company’s “Twitter Rules:” “You may not post intimate photos or videos that were taken or distributed without the subject’s consent.” Reddit also banned revenge porn earlier this week with an update to its privacy policy, which now bans the posting of nude and sexual images without the consent of the subject. The vast majority of social media users don’t do horrible things online. Unfortunately, lecturing and deploring the bozos who do probably won’t work, because they’re beyond shaming. Social media companies have, quite literally, made fortunes for their founders. There is no reasonable reason why they should not protect their users by acting more responsibly. Related content brandpost How an Indian real-estate juggernaut keeps growing by harnessing the power of zero A South Indian real-estate titan is known for the infinite variety and impressive scale of its projects, but one of its most towering achievements amounts to nothing literally. By Michael Kure, SAP Contributor May 31, 2023 5 mins Digital Transformation brandpost Hybrid working: the new workplace normal IT leaders discuss how a more broadly dispersed workforce impacts device deployment, connectivity, and the employee experience, even as more workers return to the office. By Michael Krieger May 31, 2023 5 mins Remote Work opinion Can you spot the hidden theme of CSO’s Future of Cybersecurity summit? By Beth Kormanik May 31, 2023 2 mins Events Cybercrime Artificial Intelligence case study How IT leaders use EV tech to fuel the transport revolution in Kenya Many African nations are starting to invest in electric vehicle (EV) transportation as a means to broaden access and help keep pace with global environmental initiatives. In Kenya, strides are being made despite industry and tech leaders grappling to By Vincent Matinde May 31, 2023 5 mins CIO CTO Emerging Technology Podcasts Videos Resources Events SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe