by Tom Kaneshige

Buzzwords and Jargon Just Aren’t Revolutionary Anymore

Dec 11, 20143 mins
CIOConsumer ElectronicsMarketing

As tech cultures collide with mainstream culture, tech buzzwords have led to serious consequences. Techno jargon is partially to blame for the demise of a 100-year-old magazine as well as general confusion in the C-suite.

Credit: Thinkstock

In the world of tech press releases and Silicon Valley executive speeches, certain buzzwords abound. There’s the tried-and-true “scalable and robust” solution, the ubiquitous “multi-platform,” and, of course, the claim to be an “industry leader.” Most tech reporters simple glaze over these words — they don’t even register anymore.

However, as tech culture comes head-to-head with mainstream culture, tech buzzwords have taken on more serious consequences. Tech jargon is partially to blame for the demise of a 100-year-old magazine, The New Republic. CIOs and CMOs continue to clash over certain tech words. Most recently, tech marketing speak has led to a California lawsuit targeting Uber.

[Related: Uber Scandal Highlights Silicon Valley’s Bad Behavior ]

Of course, it all started out as a side joke.

For instance, the HBO comedy series “Silicon Valley” made fun of the way tech people talk about their products. In the premier episode, a young, rich tech entrepreneur tells a disinterested crowd: “Hello! Woo! I’ve got seven words for you: I. Love. Goolybibs. Integrated. Multi. Platform. Functionality. Yeah!”

With The New Republic, though, it wasn’t so funny. Silicon Valley millionaire Chris Hughes, 31, who bought The New Republic two years ago, hired former Yahoo executive Guy Vidra to be the CEO in October. With typical Silicon Valley bravado, Vidra claimed to be a “wartime chief executive” and promised to “break sh-t.”

Then, in tech speak with perfect pitch, Vidra infamously told the writers and editors that The New Republic will become a “vertically integrated digital media company.” This led to a series of resignations that decimated a venerable masthead.

Senior editor Julie Ioffe gave this parting shot, reported in the New York Times: “We don’t know what their vision is. It is Silicon Valley mumbo jumbo buzzwords that don’t mean anything.”

What Weve Got Here

For CIOs, a disconnect in language and meaning can be a relationship killer at a time when CIOs need to work more closely with CMOs than ever before. Earlier this year, The CIO-CMO Omnichannel released a study showing this failure to communicate.

[Related: How to Master CMO Word Play ]

Consider the word “agile.” For CIOs, this means a software development methodology. For CMOs, this means a desired state of operations, in which the company can change direction and move rapidly as market conditions change.

Now tech buzzwords have reached the courts. California prosecutors sued Uber this week over Uber’s claim that it conducts “industry-leading” background checks on its drivers. San Francisco County District Attorney George Gascon says Uber doesn’t fingerprint its drivers, and thus is not an industry leader.

“Uber continues to misrepresent and exaggerate background checks on drivers,” says Los Angeles District Attorney Jackie Lacey, reported by SFGate. “It’s not our goal to shut them down. What we’re saying is their advertising is false.”

The next time tech reporters run across words like “industry leading” in a press release, they’ll surely do a double-take. It’s an important lesson for CIOs, tech marketers and Silicon Valley execs who mindlessly pepper their speech with tech buzzwords and jargon: Words matter.