Last year, before any bowl games were played, coaches and sportswriters ranked the Oregon Ducks No. 2 in the land, ahead of the No. 4 Nebraska Cornhuskers. Both had 10-1 records. Yet the BCS ranked Nebraska 2nd and Oregon 4th. That sent the Huskers to the championship game against No. 1 Miami (where they lost to the Hurricanes 37-14), and relegated Oregon to the Fiesta bowl (they beat Colorado 38-16). Here’s how the BCS came to the opposite conclusion from the coaches and sportswriters. First, the BCS averaged the rankings in the Associated Press media poll and the USA Today/ESPN coaches poll. Nebraska was ranked 4th in both, so their average was 4. Oregon’s was 2.Then, the BCS took all the computer rankings, threw out the lowest ranking, and averaged the rest. That produced a 2.17 ranking for the Huskers and 4.83 for the Ducks. (Here, lower is better.) SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe The reason why Oregon’s computer ranking was lower than Nebraska’s was due to the strength-of-schedule factor. That is derived by adding up the win/loss records of the Ducks’ opponents and also their opponents’ opponents (with the win/loss record of opponents counting for two-thirds of the score and the records of the opponents’ opponents’ counting for one-third). This number is then compared with all other teams to determine a strength-of-schedule ranking. That ranking is then divided by 25 for the final strength-of-schedule value. Oregon’s schedule ranked 31st most difficult, and Nebraska’s 14th. When divided by 25, Nebraska’s number was .56 and Oregon’s 1.24.Then, the BCS added one point for each loss. Both teams got one point. Lastly, teams are awarded extra credit for beating rivals ranked in the top 10. One point is awarded for beating the No.1 team, .9 for the No. 2 team and so on. So Nebraska received .5 quality win points and Oregon got .4.Finally, the results are calculated by adding the average poll ranking, the computer ranking, the strength-of-schedule value and the loss points, and then subtracting from that sum the quality win points. This produces the BCS rating. As with golf, the low score wins.Nebraska ended up with 7.23 (4+2.17+0.56+1 – 0.5 = 7.23).Oregon was 8.67 (2+4.83+1.24+1-0.4=8.67).Eventual national champ Miami was 2.62.Simple. Source: The Football Foundation Related content opinion The changing face of cybersecurity threats in 2023 Cybersecurity has always been a cat-and-mouse game, but the mice keep getting bigger and are becoming increasingly harder to hunt. By Dipti Parmar Sep 29, 2023 8 mins Cybercrime Security brandpost Should finance organizations bank on Generative AI? Finance and banking organizations are looking at generative AI to support employees and customers across a range of text and numerically-based use cases. By Jay Limbasiya, Global AI, Analytics, & Data Management Business Development, Unstructured Data Solutions, Dell Technologies Sep 29, 2023 5 mins Artificial Intelligence brandpost Embrace the Generative AI revolution: a guide to integrating Generative AI into your operations The CTO of SAP shares his experiences and learnings to provide actionable insights on navigating the GenAI revolution. By Juergen Mueller Sep 29, 2023 4 mins Artificial Intelligence feature 10 most in-demand generative AI skills Gen AI is booming, and companies are scrambling to fill skills gaps by hiring freelancers to make the most of the technology. These are the 10 most sought-after generative AI skills on the market right now. By Sarah K. White Sep 29, 2023 8 mins Hiring Generative AI IT Skills Podcasts Videos Resources Events SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe