Companies must visualize their IT portfolios on multiple levels and at different stages for a true and thorough perspective of their IT investments. To gain the holistic view necessary for portfolio management, investments should be viewed in aggregate and placed into categories, with the percent of IT spend apportioned across each. Figure 1 depicts one such model, developed by Peter Weill, director of MIT’s Sloan Center for Information Systems Research, and Marianne Broadbent, group vice president and head of research for Gartner’s executive programs worldwide, that is based on an ongoing study of 54 companies in seven countries. This model provides an executive-level analysis of the enterprisewide IT investment and its alignment with the general strategy of the business.Figure 2 shows a ground-level view of how one company monitors every aspect of its portfolio, from the initial business case to spending updates. Brigham Young University (BYU) has developed this tool to allow business and IT leaders to monitor projects and facilitate the university’s ongoing portfolio management. The Weill model and the BYU tool are only two examples of the many ways to look at IT portfolios and projects. But they illustrate the range of views that are essential components of a complete and effective portfolio management process. SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe Figure 1 The High-Level View?The Portfolio PyramidThe IT portfolio at the highest level can be categorized into several investment classes. In the MIT model, the portfolio pyramid rests on a base of infrastructure investments. The next layer is transactional systems, which depend on a reliable infrastructure. At the pinnacle are information-producing technologies and strategic-class systems.The Four Asset Classes?Risk Versus Reward Infrastructure These investments provide a shared and standardized base of capability for the enterprise and lead to greater business flexibility and integration. Infrastructure investments are moderately risky because of their technologies’ long life-spans and technical uncertainty. Transactional These IT initiatives process and automate the basic transactions of a company. They are intended to reduce costs and boost productivity and boast an average internal rate of return of 25 percent to 40 percent. These investments have the least risk of the four classes. Informational These systems provide information for managing a company. Their payoff comes from shorter time-to-market, superior quality and the ability to set premium prices. They are moderately risky because companies often have difficulty acting on information to generate business value. Strategic These investments, almost always external-facing systems, pay off in sales growth, competitive advantage and stronger market positioning. But they are the riskiest of the classes: 10 percent will produce spectacular results, but 50 percent will fail to break even.Three Custom PortfoliosCompany IT portfolios in the MIT study sample show different proportions of total IT investment in the four classes, depending on whether their strategic focus is cost-control, agility or a balance of the two. Cost-Focused Portfolio Agility Portfolio Balance Cost & Agility Portfolio SOURCE: M.I.T. SLOAN CENTER FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH Figure 2A Ground-Level View?The Portfolio DashboardBrigham Young University developed a Web-based tool that allows managers to see a list of projects prioritized by portfolio category at a glance. Project details are just one click away, allowing business and IT leaders to monitor the ongoing status of projects.SOURCE: BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITYPROJECT STATUSClicking on the “Log” link brings up past status log entries.PROJECT PERSONNELKey project personnel are listed (“University Sponsor” would be “Business Sponsor” in a company).FLEXIBILITY MATRIXAt the beginning of the firewall project, the university sponsor said that project scope was least flexible and schedule was most flexible. The project manager must explain the reasons for a yellow or red status. PROJECT CALENDARThe black line across the top of the calendar (April through Aug.) was the original schedule; this project will take an additional two months to deploy.PROJECT LISTAll projects in a portfolio are shown in order of priority. Clicking on a project link, in this case Firewall Upgrade, brings up the information shown at right. Related content opinion Why all IT talent should be irreplaceable Forget the conventional wisdom about firing irreplaceable employees. Because if your employees aren’t irreplaceable, you’re doing something wrong. By Bob Lewis Oct 03, 2023 5 mins Hiring IT Skills Staff Management case study ConocoPhillips goes global with digital twins Initial forays into using digital twins across its major fields has inspired the multinational hydrocarbon exploration and production company to further adopt the technology across its entire portfolio. By Thor Olavsrud Oct 03, 2023 8 mins CIO Mining, Oil, and Gas Digital Transformation brandpost ST Engineering showcases applications of new technologies to stay ahead of disruption By Jane Chan Oct 03, 2023 7 mins Generative AI Digital Transformation Innovation news Nominations extended for CIO100 ASEAN Awards 2023 By Shirin Robert Oct 02, 2023 2 mins IDG Events IT Leadership Podcasts Videos Resources Events SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe