With companies like Citigroup putting their wholly owned offshore service centers up for sale, there's been much discussion about whether the captive model makes financial sense. A recent study from the Everest Research Institute confirms that going with a third-party provider is usually cheaper. Outsourcing to a third-party IT services provider offshore is typically 5 to 15 percent cheaper than the offshore captive (company-owned) alternative, according to a recent study by the Everest Research Institute . The “Comparison of Outsourced and Captive Solutions for Capturing Value from Outsourcing” offers an evaluation of total expenses of each model, including operating costs, productivity, transition, sales and marketing, and margins.Although one might assume that a captive offshore center might be cheaper, given that there are no sales expenses or profit margins built into their cost structures, that wasn’t the case in this study. The cost advantage of the third-party model derives from better leverages of scale and leaner processes of third-party operations as well as the greater overhead management and higher investments in knowledge transfer required to set up and manage your own offshore center.However, that rare breed – the best-in-class captive center – can match third-party performance, says Everest. In some cases, a well-run captive center is cheaper than outsourcing. SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe Value, not cost, should be the driving factor when you decide whether to work with an offshore vendor or go it alone, says Everest. The third-party model may be better suited for customers who value minimizing geographic risk, attracting scarce talent not core to the business, and scaling costs to match demand for processes with fluctuations in volume. The captive model may work better for organizations that value gaining access to new geographic markets, direct access to local management talent, total control and greater integration with the parent company. “Many of the factors that drive up the near-term captive operating cost structure can be valuable investments in the long term to create business and strategic impact,” says Nikhil Rajpal, vice president of global sourcing for Everest Research Institute. “To capture the value associated with the captive model requires an investment of effort and finances, and the company moving the work offshore as a captive operation must maintain focus on cost-reduction opportunities where relevant.”“In many cases,” says Eric Simonson, managing principal of Everest Research Institute, “a combination of both models is the optimal solution.” Blended Base Salary Costs Captives recruit more actively and pay a premium for soft skills, while third parties attract staff more cheaply by providing career paths. Third parties Captives Annual salary range $7,770 to $8,200 $9,500 to $10,300 Shift Policies Third parties have the geographical mix and leverage to operate multishift environments. Third parties Captives Shifts per day 1.2 to 1.5 1 to 1.2 Annual Rental Costs (Bangalore) Third parties build big campuses on the outskirts of the city, while captives tend to operate in more expensive metro centers. Third parties Captives Cost per square foot $11 to $13 $14 to $16 Expatriate/General Management Staff Captives need more leadership bench strength. Third parties Captives Expatriates for every 1,000 full-time employees (FTEs) 0 to 1 3 to 5 General management staff for every 1,000 FTEs 12 to 14 16 to 18 Average General Management Salary Captives’ pay policies are governed by parent company and, because they look for more relevant industry experience, pay more. Third parties Captives Annual salary range $55,000 to $65,000 $70,000 to $90,000 Travel and Entertainment Costs Captives have more liberal travel policy guidelines. Third parties often provide accommodations in company-owned/managed properties and mandate economy-class travel, even for senior positions. Third parties Captives Cost per full-time employee $280 to $320 $900 to $1,060 SOURCE: Everest Research Institute Related content opinion The changing face of cybersecurity threats in 2023 Cybersecurity has always been a cat-and-mouse game, but the mice keep getting bigger and are becoming increasingly harder to hunt. By Dipti Parmar Sep 29, 2023 8 mins Cybercrime Security brandpost Should finance organizations bank on Generative AI? Finance and banking organizations are looking at generative AI to support employees and customers across a range of text and numerically-based use cases. By Jay Limbasiya, Global AI, Analytics, & Data Management Business Development, Unstructured Data Solutions, Dell Technologies Sep 29, 2023 5 mins Artificial Intelligence brandpost Embrace the Generative AI revolution: a guide to integrating Generative AI into your operations The CTO of SAP shares his experiences and learnings to provide actionable insights on navigating the GenAI revolution. By Juergen Mueller Sep 29, 2023 4 mins Artificial Intelligence feature 10 most in-demand generative AI skills Gen AI is booming, and companies are scrambling to fill skills gaps by hiring freelancers to make the most of the technology. These are the 10 most sought-after generative AI skills on the market right now. By Sarah K. White Sep 29, 2023 8 mins Hiring Generative AI IT Skills Podcasts Videos Resources Events SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe