This story was updated to include additional reporting. To read the original
As organizations weigh what to do with Windows XP upgrades, the thought of leapfrogging the much-maligned Vista often comes to mind. But be warned, says a recent report from Gartner: Migrating directly from XP to the next release,
Windows 7, could be a dicey proposition.
More on CIO.com
Why I’m Skipping Windows Vista: IT Speaks Out
Microsoft Throw Away Vista?
Understand the Risks of Skipping Windows Vista
Microsoft Takes Heat for Double Talk on Windows 7
Five Reasons Why Skipping Windows Vista Could Backfire
The report by analyst Michael Silver states that most organizations should not skip Vista
entirely and should install Vista on new PCs as they are deployed. The main reason:
Independent software vendors (ISVs) don’t support old versions of Windows long enough or new
versions of Windows soon enough. Also, Silver suggests, Windows 7 is not likely not to arrive on time.
“The next version of Windows may be delivered later than Microsoft says and be just as
unsuitable for immediate deployment,” as earlier versions, writes Silver. Organizations that
skipped Windows 98, Windows 2000 and Windows XP often had ISV support issues, as well as
difficult and rushed migrations. Those who skip Vista “are likely to have the same
problems,” he added in an interview.
The only companies that may be able to skip Vista entirely
are those doing forklift migrations—updating hardware and OS all at once—and
those that don’t plan on deploying Windows 7 until mid-2011, Silver says. This would be 18
months after Microsoft’s stated Windows 7 ship date, the estimated time that Windows 7 will
be mature and stable enough to deploy, in Gartner’s view.
Delay may also cost you. Businesses without Software Assurance (Microsoft’s maintenance and
support service) must budget to buy software license upgrades. Gartner predicts that Windows
7 will include downgrade rights to Windows Vista only. If this is the case, Windows XP PCs
purchased in 2010, 2011 and 2012 will be bought with Windows Vista licenses so that XP can
run until a Windows 7 deployment. As a result, organizations won’t have Windows 7 licenses
when it is time to deploy and will have to buy upgrades.
Despite the potential drawbacks, many CIOs plan to stay with XP in the foreseeable
future, given the investment required. “It means also upgrading to Office and possibly
Exchange and now Windows Server—there’s too much cost, time and energy,” says Stephen
Laughlin, director of IT at the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.
Roger Kay, founder and president of research firm Endpoint Technologies, says that Windows 7
may be an opportunity for Microsoft to try to sweep the bad vibes of
Vista under the rug.
For XP users frustrated by Vista, Windows 7 may appear like a fresh new start, even if
underneath it is just an enhanced version of Vista, Kay says.
“Vista was such a giant leap from XP, and for many it was disappointing and adoption has
been slow,” Kay says. “The leap from XP to 7 will be harder in some respects, so it is key
for Microsoft to preserve what was good in Vista and fix what didn’t work.”