Using the Internet to transfer rich media means guzzling bandwidth. Setting price per use makes sense. Three cheers for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Its ruling on the Comcast v. FCC case, over whether the ISP can throttle BitTorrent traffic, sent Net neutrality back to the drawing board. Net neutrality—the FCC-supported concept that would require Internet service companies such as Verizon, Comcast and ATaannddT to give Web users unfettered access to content regardless of how much bandwidth it consumes—was ill-conceived from the get-go. When it comes to using the Internet to transfer rich media like video, business usage isn’t the biggest bandwidth consumer. Sure, that might change as offerings like telepresence are more widely deployed, but for now, Net neutrality legislation is aimed at private use. The primary target is, in my opinion, the group Don Tapscott, author of Grown Up Digital, labels “digital natives”—young people who have had access to technology from birth. They believe the Internet was created in Genesis chapter one, that bandwidth is infinite and free, and it is their unalienable right to consume as much of it as they want. Never mind any additional usage costs; most of their bills are paid by their parents, anyway. ISPs share responsibility for the Net neutrality mess. They built their satellite, DSL and cable infrastructures on a Field of Dreams-style market-share plan rather than realistic billing plans based on bandwidth consumption. The ISPs built it and, oh boy, did customers ever come to the Web, bandwidth-hogging applications in tow. The big picture is this: bandwidth is finite and demand is only going to increase because businesses are just starting to leverage bit-consuming video apps, and there are still 100 million Americans who have no access to broadband, according to a recently released FCC report. And no one wants Net cops deciding what traffic goes through unfettered and what gets throttled. There’s a simple solution: You pay for what you get. If you “get” more, as in more bits consumed, you pay more. The ISPs can solve this problem overnight by studying the early pricing models of AOL. Write me at gbeach@cio.com and I’ll send you a copy of the FCC plan. It’s a good starting point. Gary Beach, Publisher Emeritus gbeach@cio.com Related content brandpost Sponsored by AWS in collaboration with IBM How digital twin technology is changing complex industrial processes forever As the use cases for digital twins proliferate, it is becoming clear that data-driven enterprises with a track record of innovation stand the best chance of success. By Laura McEwan Dec 05, 2023 4 mins Digital Transformation brandpost Sponsored by AWS in collaboration with IBM Why modernising applications needs to be a ‘must’ for businesses seeking growth Around one-third of enterprises are spending heavily on application modernisation and aiming for cloud native status. The implications for corporate culture, structure and priorities will be profound. By Laura McEwan Dec 05, 2023 5 mins Digital Transformation opinion 11 ways to reduce your IT costs now Reorienting IT’s budget toward future opportunities is a big reason why CIOs should review their IT portfolios with an eye toward curbing unnecessary spending and realizing maximum value from every IT investment. By Stephanie Overby Dec 05, 2023 11 mins Budget Cloud Management IT Governance news analysis SAP faces breakdown in trust over innovation plans The company’s plan to offer future innovations in S/4HANA only to subscribers of its Rise with SAP offering is alienating customers, user conference hears. By Peter Sayer Dec 05, 2023 6 mins SAP Cloud Management Innovation Podcasts Videos Resources Events SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe