As I wrote previously, marketing \n\nautomation is a distinct category of products, even though highly related to sales force automation and CRM. And the marketing automation arena is \n\nevolving furiously, particularly as social media and crowd-sourcing techniques come into vogue.Jigsaw is one such innovator, focusing on the assembly and maintenance of high quality data about prospects in a cross-customer way. By \n\nleveraging what each of its customers knows about a given Lead, Jigsaw becomes the "high water mark" source for information from all of its \n\ncustomers. Classic crowd-sourcing, applied to the very difficult problem of lead data enrichment. This has been such a sore spot for marketers because \n\nmost leads don't want vendors to know a lot about them. They create multiple avatars to evade the intelligence gathering \n\nthat's part of any good marketing automation system. Jigsaw managed to counteract this "keep me anonymous" phenomenon with a set of incentives for \n\nmembers and participants, and garnered a good reputation for lead quality with sales managers.Think Plaxo meets Wikipedia. And now, that meets Salesforce.com.So why does it matter? A CRM system, by itself, is not particularly powerful. Even if usage is mandated, if the system doesn't have good data in it, \n\nusers will resist. Of course, the fewer the users, the less interesting and representative the data in the system will be. The virtuous cycle of quality \n\ndata-->more usage-->more data has to start with data, because that's what you can most directly change. And what's the most notorious area for bad \n\ndata quality, both in the technical sense and in the meaning\/relevance of the information? If you've been reading my articles, you know it's leads.If you can do something \u2014 anything \u2014 to improve the quality and credibility of leads, the CRM system becomes instantly more \n\nattractive to sales reps and marketers alike. That's typically the majority of users. While there are several lead and account data services from \n\ncompanies like Hoovers, Lexis-Nexis, and D&B, from the user's perspective the integration of these services has seemed arm's length. Since you can \n\nnever make things easy enough for users, this acquisition should improve things from the users' perspective.What other kinds of DQ things need to be considered when it comes to leads? Real-time deduping is a must for any serious marketing and sales team. Dupes cause huge credibility problems and user headaches. In the \n\nCRM world, there are great tools for this from CRMfusion, RingLead, and others.\nAddress cleansing and validation tools are important for disambiguating companies and divisions, and for removing a few chores from the sales rep's \n\nlife. There are services for this from Hoovers, D&B, Jigsaw, and others, plus some high-end services that cover millions of business addresses outside \n\nthe U.S.\nAccount profiling services provide names and contact information for key executives at a range of companies. These services are invaluable if your \n\nsales team needs to profile the org chart of their target companies and "sell high." Typically, though, the information never goes below the VP level. \n\nDozens of firms \u2014 both mainstream and boutique \u2014 provide variations of this service.\nE-mail appending services provide an e-mail address if you know other information, or do reverse lookups that enrich an "e-mail only" lead. While \n\nthese services only cover U.S. corporate email addresses, they can be very helpful. Expect something less than a 50 percent match rate, though. \n\nCompanies like OneSource (was IDexec), e-mail appenders, and other service firms offer this on a range of platforms.What's all this cost? Even though I contend that $\/lead is too often a misleading metric, ask yourself "if it was worth paying $X for a lead with bad \n\ndata quality, isn't it worth paying another, say, $30\/yr in automation to keep that lead current?" These tools, though, are really focused on improving the quality of the leads you already have in your system. Jigsaw is more about bringing in new \n\nnames to fill out the "white spaces" in your target company's org chart. Not a replacement for lead gen, but a potent supplement.If Salesforce.com isn't your CRM system, Jigsaw data will still be available in whichever vendor you need. Integrating the data will be tougher, but \n\nin most situations a monthly one-way import of new additions will be fine. And if you had tried Jigsaw and didn't like it, there are a number of \n\ncompetitive offerings (with extra features and their own secret sauce).Is this the harbinger of the end of lead gen? I don't think anybody's going to go that far. But this should be a warning to any CIO who deploys an \n\nempty CRM to users: they're expecting more than that from you now.David Taber is the author of the new Prentice Hall book, "Salesforce.com Secrets of Success" and is the CEO of SalesLogistix, a certified \n\nSalesforce.com consultancy focused on business process improvement through use of CRM systems. SalesLogistix clients are in North America, \n\nEurope, Israel, and India, and David has over 25 years experience in high tech, including 10 years at the VP level or above.