In addition to being a top priority for legislators and the press, healthcare has become a major target for IT vendors. Driven by economic pressures
that force hospitals to merge and consolidate, regulations that force better documentation and security, and legislation that may fundamentally change the
industry’s business models, healthcare companies will spend more on technology this year than any other type of company, according to a study released
Jan. 31 by Enterprise Strategy
Slideshow: Apple’s iPad: The Key Capabilities, at a Glance
Much of the attention focuses on endpoint devices such as the iPhone, the new iPad and other gadgets doctors or nurses can carry during patient
exams. However, the real spending will be for core applications such as billing and records systems, business-information systems, and upgrades that
standardize IT after mergers or acquisitions, according to Mark Bowker, analyst at
[ For timely virtualization news and expert advice on strategy, see CIO.com’s Virtualization Drilldown section. ]
The ESG survey of 515 companies with IT budgets greater than $50 million showed 52 percent have IT budgets larger in 2010 than 2009; in
healthcare 67 percent of companies will increase spending.
Half of all healthcare companies plan to add IT staff positions this year as well — more than any other industry surveyed.
“We have seen some gadget-y technology in healthcare environments. Certain endpoint devices become attractive as mobile options for a certain
class of users, but IT has to deploy them in a way that’s in compliance with regulations,” Bowker says.
Top priorites for IT spending are business intelligence systems, network upgrades and improved security, according to ESG’s survey.
Billing Software, Virtual Desktops Top of Mind
The highest priority for healthcare companies is to capture billing data immediately — in real time as a doctor provides the services —
so the hospital can bill an insurance company as quickly as possible, according toLeo Carpio, vice president for the Health Care IT & Services
practice of equity research firm Caris & Co.
Weighing the Pros/Cons of Desktop Virtualization
“A lot of iPhones have apps that tie in to medical records programs, and can let a doctor pull up prescription data, look at labs, or put in orders from
the phone,” Carpio said. “[Doctors] can use the tools to avoid staying in the office to clear up paperwork.”
Virtual desktop implementations from Citrix, Microsoft, VMware and other vendors may be able to provide secure access and keep data locked up
even if the device is stolen, but the effort to support handhelds may be more effort than it’s worth.
Citrix, seeing the opportunity to extend its leading share in the terminal-services and VDI markets into the smartphone market, last week announced a
reference architecture called the “nirvana phone” that
would support full-function virtual desktops on smartphones. Citrix and development partner Open Kernel Labs, which develops embedded virtualization
software for handheld devices, are promoting the design to smartphone manufacturers and carriers. Most successful access or desktop virtualization
projects in healthcare focus on systems that are beefier than handhelds — workstations in exam rooms or on mobile carts on hospital floors, for
example, Bowker said.
“One client we had deployed VDI to accelerate access to applications in exam rooms,” Bowker said. “Without VDI it took several minutes for a
doctor to log in to all the apps, and this cut that to just seconds. At the end of the day that allowed them to increase billable hours on a daily basis; that
justified the cost easily.”
That kind of in-place, controllable access is much more workable — and much more cost-efficient — than trying to build
virtual-desktop access into iPhones and other relatively insecure devices, according to Carl Labbadia, director of information systems at Grove Hill Medical Center in central Connecticut.
About 350 of the 450 or 500 employees at Grove Hill need to access medical records on a daily basis — demand the IT department meets
easily using Citrix terminal services software running on six physical servers, Labbadia says.
“We get about 25 or 30 people on a server before we start running into performance problems because we start to run out of memory,” Labbadia
says. Employees who have to scan documents into the system or who rely on other resource-intensive applications that don’t function well through
terminal services get full VDI connections — a virtual machine running on a backend server that behaves like a PC dedicated to one user.
“We support PDAs and laptops with a secure wireless network — and we’re expanding that so there’s a secure VPN for employees and a
non-secure one for visitors — but we don’t send any clinical data over that,” Labbadia says.
The pressure to make all aspects of patient care more efficient almost guarantees some hospitals will come up with cost-justifiable implementations of
iPhones or Blackberries even to access patient records, Carpio says. That shouldn’t be a problem as long as they cover basic security, however.
“The real data theft incidents you see in hospital environments aren’t things like hackers trying to break in to an iPhone’s wireless connection,” Carpio
says. They’re pretty basic things — the employee whose laptop was stolen from a car in the parking lot with a lot of patient data on it. Those are
the kinds of basics you have to cover.”
Not all healthcare IT decisions are based on basic technology concerns, however.
Slideshow: iPhones and iPods on the Job: Creative Uses
“There’s something of a battle for popularity between iPhones and BlackBerries, but iPhones are turning out to be more popular in a lot of hospitals
because they’re smooth,” Carpio says. “They’re a lot easier to disinfect with a wipe than something with a lot of buttons; you might not consider that in
some other environment.”
Follow everything from CIO.com on Twitter @CIOonline.