As the latest technologies are incorporated into the business process, organizations will naturally become more comfortable when working with third-party \n\ntechnology vendors. This means the ability to identify, select, and manage the right technology vendor can make the difference between the success and \n\nfailure of a new business initiative. But, while many sourcing and vendor management (SVM) professionals are starting to play an increasingly important role \n\nin this emerging technology evaluation process, many of Forrester's sourcing clients explain that their involvement is not always clearly defined, resulting in a \n\nmore reactive and makeshift role than they would like.Why? In part, it's due to the historical nature of the challenges SVM professionals face. For example, emerging technologies are not traditionally \n\nconsidered the responsibility of sourcing professionals, making them a less likely player for key insight. Additionally, the high standards sourcing applies to \n\nlarger contracts often raises red flags, which does not translate very easily to new technologies. The unintended consequence? SVM professionals often \n\nslow the adoption process and are viewed as barriers to innovation, rather than supporters and enablers.Despite these challenges, at Forrester, we're still hearing that sourcing's role is becoming more relevant and more valued in the evaluation process. In \n\norder to better understand the changing role sourcing plays when evaluating emerging technology, we asked 113 SVM professionals about their current \n\nfocus and outlook on emerging technologies\u2014including which technologies would impact their business over the next five years, and whether they \n\nwere actively involved in sourcing these technologies in 2010 to 2011. The result? Key differences exist between the expectations for various technologies, \n\nand the actual role of sourcing. For example:\u2022 SaaS and business analytics are expected to have significant business impact. This result is in line with the rapid growth of these \n\ntechnologies: SaaS is infiltrating most enterprises with a dramatic affect on software and services contracts, while the evolution of business analytics still \n\nholds the promise of significant business impact. But, when it comes to actively sourcing these technologies\u2014we saw a great difference. While 58% \n\nof respondents are involved in sourcing SaaS today, only 47% are currently sourcing business analytics. \u2022 SVM professionals can play a more active role in mobility and UC. We weren't too surprised to learn that the more cutting-edge \n\ntechnologies are also the ones currently lacking SVM's involvement. These technologies include videoconferecing tools, tablet PCs, and social technologies, \n\nwhich will all have a big impact on the business, but are not currently influenced by the sourcing team. But this gap between the expected value and current \n\nrole of sourcing may highlight a long-term opportunity: as IT and the business select which new buzz technologies to adopt, they will need help clarifying \n\ncontractual terms and distinguishing vendor offerings. That's where SVM professionals should chime in, to improve the relevance in the emerging technology \n\nprocess.What about SVM professionals who have a clearly established role in the new technology adoption process? Even in these instances, the level of \n\ncontribution often varies significantly. We found that:\u2022 When involved, SVM focuses on contractual terms, and vendor viability. By negotiating prices, establishing exit clauses, ensuring \n\ncompliance standards, and investigating vendors' financial stability, SVM professionals are helping mitigate the risks inherent in new technology \n\nevaluations.\u2022 Security, scalability, and integration requirements are likely IT specialist domain. Although SVM professionals will work with IT to \n\ndefine contractual terms, the vast majority are willing to defer to the expertise of IT specialists in these areas. In the end, it's important for SVM professionals to clearly define and take ownership of their responsibilities in the evaluation process. Otherwise, \n\nestablishing sourcing's value within the business will become an increasingly difficult task. This means sourcing professionals need to proactively show IT \n\nand the business examples of how sourcing has helped in the past\u2014and use those examples to clarify future roles. And amongst other things, SVM \n\nmust be prepared to enable innovation, by providing new levels of flexibility. Rather than slowing the adoption process, consider raising concerns and \n\nallowing business users to decide if the risks are acceptable and reasonable.Chris Andrews is Senior Analyst at Forrester Research, serving sourcing and vendor management professionals. His research focuses on how \n\norganizations can identify, integrate, and manage innovation and emerging technologies.