A new academic study shows that the finance chief bailing out is even more a predictor of such trouble than is a CEO departure. Because of the superior information that top executives have, they usually are in a position to recognize if their company’s stock is headed for a decline — before the realization hits outside investors. That gives the executives a chance to resign before that happens.But how useful is the resignation of a CEO or CFO to investors seeking indications of a possible future bankruptcy?To answer this question, Joseph Beams of the University of New Orleans, Hua-Wei Huang of SUNY Old Westbury and Yun-Chia Yan of the University of New Orleans Department of Accounting investigated a sample of 9,942 firm years from 2008 and 2009.Their results, to be published in an upcoming issue of Accounting and The Public Interest, “show a significant relationship between CEO and CFO resignations and the firm’s subsequent bankruptcy even after controlling for other predictors of bankruptcy.” But not all is equal between finance chief and boss. The CFOs’ pre-bankruptcy resignation rate was found at 9.52% to be higher than that of their bosses at 7.22%.More strikingly, Beams, Huang and Yan found that future bankruptcy and “the resignation of the CEO only (have) a significant relationship when (the) resigned CFO is not included” in their model. “This means that a CFO resignation is a greater predictor of a future bankruptcy.” The authors suggest two possible explanations.“It may be because the CFO is more involved in the financial aspects of the company and, therefore, in a better position to identify the impending demise,” they write. “It is also possible that both the CEO and CFO may recognize the situation but that the CEO is more likely to stay because the CEO is the top executive and the CFO may feel less obligated to hang on.”In either case, the strong linkage between the resignation of the executive most likely to possess financial information and subsequent bankruptcy points to an inadequacy of Reg FD and other disclosure requirements, they argue,While the SEC requires companies to report the reasons for the resignations of top executives on form 8-K, “the timeliness and completeness of the disclosures may not be adequate to protect the investing public,” they conclude. “If top executives of a company are able to predict a bankruptcy several years beforehand and prior to the public’s knowledge, there is a risk of improper disclosure.” Related content feature 4 remedies to avoid cloud app migration headaches The compelling benefits of using proprietary cloud-native services come at a price: vendor lock-in. Here are ways CIOs can effectively plan without getting stuck. By Robert Mitchell Nov 29, 2023 9 mins CIO Managed Service Providers Managed IT Services case study Steps Gerresheimer takes to transform its IT CIO Zafer Nalbant explains what the medical packaging manufacturer does to modernize its IT through AI, automation, and hybrid cloud. By Jens Dose Nov 29, 2023 6 mins CIO SAP ServiceNow feature Per Scholas redefines IT hiring by diversifying the IT talent pipeline What started as a technology reclamation nonprofit has since transformed into a robust, tuition-free training program that seeks to redefine how companies fill tech skills gaps with rising talent. By Sarah K. White Nov 29, 2023 11 mins Diversity and Inclusion Hiring news Saudi Arabia will host the World Expo 2030 in Riyadh By Andrea Benito Nov 28, 2023 4 mins Podcasts Videos Resources Events SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe