High-tech CEOs aren't economists. So let's not give their rhetoric an economist's importance. The terrible economy and recession-that-won’t-go-away has gotten so bad that many people now look for any sign of recovery—in job claims data, in a few retailers’ positive results, and even in a forward-looking report from the Bank of Japan on Japan’s GDP. The stench of desperation for positive news is everywhere. In the high-tech arena, media types, industry analysts and inventive bloggers are now pouring over statements made by CEOs of enterprise software and hardware vendors as they report quarterly earnings. “Oh, please, software CEO…please tell us everything’s getting better?!” The latest aggregation of “Software CEOs’ Take on the Economy” comes from the WSJ’s Digits blog: a tidy summary of economic recovery comments from the leaders of Salesforce.com, Autodesk and Intuit. This group of CEOs say that we have not hit the bottom, which, of course, contradicts what some bigger-name tech titans have recently said about the figurative bottom being hit, notes the Digits blog. Perhaps the best example of the “two-faced” CEO is HP’s Mark Hurd, in a CNBC article on CEO economic prognostications: “HP gave a disappointing full-year revenue outlook this week, and although CEO Mark Hurd said the company had seen pockets of improvement, he told Reuters: ‘We’re expecting roughly more of the same.'” That clears it up. For me, using the tech industry as a barometer on the overall economy just doesn’t work, chiefly because tech spending (one way or the other) usually lags the overall global economy—sometimes by very long stretches. Enterprise software purchases don’t resemble going to the mall to buy some new jeans. And second, tech CEOs aren’t the most objective “economists” in the world—what with the complex amalgamation of shareholders, partners, customers, employees and financial analysts that they have to contend with and satisfy. As I pointed out last fall, right after SAP told its own employees to “not order any new IT equipment at this time,” it launched a marketing offensive, reminding its current and would-be customers that a recessionary environment is when “great companies invest in SAP software to beat the competition!”—just as I snarkily predicted would happen. I think I’ll stick to the views of those economists who aren’t running billion-dollar software companies. Do you Tweet? Follow me on Twitter @twailgum. Follow everything from CIO.com on Twitter @CIOonline. Related content opinion What CIOs Need to Know About HP's Acquisition of Autonomy Here's why you should be paying attention: it's a big analytics play that could help lead the way to making sense of all the unstructured data that's overwhelming enterprises of all sizes, says analyst Charles King. By Todd R. Weiss Aug 24, 2011 4 mins Business Intelligence Data Warehousing Data Management opinion Enterprise BI Made Simple Will a simplified version of enterprise business intelligence software spur user adoption? Gartner analyst James Richardson thinks so. By Todd R. Weiss Aug 15, 2011 4 mins Business Intelligence Data Management opinion ERP Market Shake-Up: What It Means to Your Company ERP vendors continue to merge and be acquired at a steady pace in 2011. Here are some tips on how you can protect your company's interests as the marketplace continues to shift, from analyst Albert Pang. By Todd R. Weiss Aug 03, 2011 4 mins CIO ERP Systems Enterprise Applications opinion Cut IT Costs for Older ERP Apps With Third-Party Support Some large enterprises are looking to third-party ERP support providers to reduce their maintenance and support costs by 50 percent or more rather than sticking with their existing ERP vendors. Rebecca Wettemann of Nucleus Research explains the circu By Todd R. Weiss Aug 02, 2011 4 mins ERP Systems IT Strategy Enterprise Applications Podcasts Videos Resources Events SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe