Project managers should use baselining as a tool to improve, not to demonstrate failure. There seems to be a growing phenomenon in the US, and I believe worldwide, that nobody takes responsibility or ownership anymore. OK, this is not new but I believe it is growing. This fear of ownership is in turn creating a fear of commitment. We see this throughout society. I also see this in the world of project management.Baselining a project is a way of making a commitment to an end date. The project is tracked from that point forward against the baseline plan that was committed. I wrote earlier about how this is like a game of kick the can as we track actual progress against the plan. The problem becomes that most projects track poorly against this plan. The poor performance of the project usually has less to do with the project manager or the project team and more to do with the systemic failures of the organizational culture to provide the proper tools and governance to allow the projects to succeed. These systemic issues really become the moose on the table that no one wants to talk about. As a result the PM and/or the project team are blamed for the failure.Not producing a baseline that we can use to track the project against is a way of disguising the fact that the project if off track and allowing the PM and the team to survive until the scapegoats are sought after the project fails. Everyone hopes that they will not be the ones that are sacrificed when the failure become evident. While it is true that the creation of a baseline and tracking against that plan will expose project problems earlier, I contend that this will also increase the opportunity for success. At a minimum this would minimize the failure gap of the project. Identifying problems early allows for corrective actions to be taken to put the project back on track. This then should be every project manager’s approach to tracking their projects. This will increase the opportunity to be successful and decrease the possibility of being the first on the chopping block.As noted earlier the problems that will be uncovered are likely due to failures within the organization. Identifying these problems will not only help the current project but will also help future projects if the failures are corrected. Additionally the PM and project team will not be held solely accountable for resulting failures in the project. The baseline is not something to be feared. Rather it is the most important tool that a project manager has at their disposal to increase the possibility of success. So don’t fear the baseline. Embrace and utilize it to create success for you and you project. Related content news Concerns remain even as the EU reaches a landmark deal to govern AI Experts believe the new regulation would add a significant compliance burden on businesses as some argue it could even stifle the growth of the rapidly developing technology. By Gagandeep Kaur Dec 11, 2023 7 mins Regulation Regulation Government feature CIOs grapple with the ethics of implementing AI With ethical considerations around AI use increasingly top of mind, IT leaders are developing governance frameworks, establishing review boards, and coming to terms with the difficult discussions and decisions ahead. By Esther Shein Dec 11, 2023 13 mins Generative AI Data Governance IT Governance feature Reed Smith turns to AI for lawyer staffing solution The legal firm’s Smart Resourcing tool helps balance workloads and ensure partners find associates with the right skills and experience, while empowering employees to make connections across the firm’s global footprint. By Sarah K. White Dec 11, 2023 8 mins CIO 100 Legal Digital Transformation news Emirates NBD drives sustainability goals with Microsoft partnership By Andrea Benito Dec 10, 2023 2 mins CIO Podcasts Videos Resources Events SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe