Consumers are increasingly wary of user-generated reviews because unscrupulous organizations often pay people to post misleading evaluations. But Edmunds.com is fighting back against the fakers. Here's how. Crowdsourcing is very popular these days. When you search for a new restaurant, or consider buying a PC, you probably look at user reviews on the Web. But it pays to remember that things are seldom as they seem; many reviews are produced by companies hyping their own products or dissing the products and services of competitors. And it’s not just neighborhood pizzerias. Even respected organizations like Samsung – my colleague Tom Kaneshige wrote about this back in April – have been caught posting fake reviews. (Samsung later apologized and said it stopped the practice.) Now Edmunds.com, a well-known car shopping website, is suing a Texas company it claims posted 60 or more fake reviews of automobile dealers. Edmunds filed suit against the company after it noticed a pattern in the reviews of roughly two dozen dealers. “The reviews were obviously not coming from the variety of sources and locations being stated,” Edmunds Chief General Counsel Ken Levin told The Los Angeles Times. Levin said Edmunds discovered about 2,000 fake identities registered on its site and tied them to Humankind Design Ltd., a company that manages online reputations. The lawsuit alleges that Humankind violated Edmunds’s membership agreement by posting bogus reviews and says the company defrauded other members with those reviews. Humankind did not respond to my request for a comment, but it did speak to a writer with Automotive News: “I can say that we completely disagree with the assertion that we are posting fraudulent reviews online,” said Justin Anderson, the owner of Humankind. Edmunds said it identified 25 dealers that hired Humankind to fill out reviews but declined to give those dealers’ names or locations, according to the story in The LA Times I’m reminded of a Twitter-related scandal that broke last year. It became known that politicians and other attention-grabbing types/businesses were buying followers. For example, a site called fiverr.com offers to sell 1,000 “real” Twitter followers for $5. User reviews can be very helpful, but it should be no surprise that ethically-challenged businesses are gaming the system for their own advantage. Bottom line: If you see nothing but glowing reviews about a company, product or service, it’s probably a safe assumption that things aren’t what they seem. Image via Trackur.com Related content brandpost Resilient data backup and recovery is critical to enterprise success As global data volumes rise, business must prioritize their resiliency strategies. By Neal Weinberg Jun 01, 2023 4 mins Security brandpost Democratizing HPC with multicloud to accelerate engineering innovations Cloud for HPC is facilitating broader access to high performance computing and accelerating innovations and opportunities for all types of organizations. By Tanya O'Hara Jun 01, 2023 6 mins Multi Cloud brandpost Survey: Marketers embrace AI at expense of metaverse investments Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has quickly rocked the world of marketing. Sitecore polled B2B marketers on their perceptions of GAI. Here’s what they said. By Dave O’Flanagan, Sitecore Jun 01, 2023 4 mins Artificial Intelligence news Zendesk to lay off another 8% of its staff, cites macroeconomic issues The new tranche of layoffs comes just six months after the company let go of 300 staffers and hired a new CEO in order to navigate its operations through macroeconomic distress. By Anirban Ghoshal Jun 01, 2023 3 mins CRM Systems IT Jobs Podcasts Videos Resources Events SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe